Law firm says vets have been harmed by “steering” practices leading homebuyers away from cheaper mortgages ST. LOUIS–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#buyingahome–Veteran homebuyersLaw firm says vets have been harmed by “steering” practices leading homebuyers away from cheaper mortgages ST. LOUIS–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#buyingahome–Veteran homebuyers

Hagens Berman: Lawsuit Accuses Veterans United Home Loans of Deceiving Military Homebuyers and Violating Real Estate Laws

2026/02/19 07:00
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Law firm says vets have been harmed by “steering” practices leading homebuyers away from cheaper mortgages

ST. LOUIS–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#buyingahome–Veteran homebuyers represented by attorneys at Hagens Berman filed a class-action lawsuit against Veterans United Home Loans, a private for-profit corporation unaffiliated with the military, accusing it of engaging in illegal predatory practices that harm vets seeking to buy a home.

The lawsuit was filed Feb. 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri against Veterans United Home Loans, owned by Mortgage Research Center, LLC, and Veterans Realty, owned by Realty Search Solutions, LLC. It accuses the parties of having capitalized on and exploited this market by deceptively suggesting it is part of the VA or the federal government, and steering clients to more costly, higher interest rate loans. Steering as a practice in real estate is an illegal practice.

If you bought a home and used Veterans United Home Loans to finance at any time since Jan. 1, 2020, find out more about your rights.

“Our lawsuit against Veterans United is two-fold,” said Steve W. Berman, managing partner and co-founder of Hagens Berman. “First, we believe Veterans United has engaged in blatantly illegal practices that have harmed homebuyers through predatory loan practices, and second, Veterans United has sought to deceive our nation’s military servicemembers by masquerading as affiliated with the U.S. Veterans Administration.”

The new lawsuit comes as part of consumer-protection law firm Hagens Berman’s efforts to create a more transparent real estate system, following on the heels of similar litigation aimed at Zillow Inc., at Rocket, and the firm’s blockbuster settlements regarding real estate brokerage fees totaling more than $1 billion.

Claims of Deception in Name & Practice

The lawsuit states that while the U.S. Veterans Administration runs an essential program for veterans and active military servicemembers looking to buy a house, Veterans United Home Loans and other defendants have no affiliation with the government and is founded and run by three individuals with no military service records.

According to the lawsuit, its website is intentionally designed to mislead home buyers into believing that it is part of the VA, based in part on its promotion that it is “The Nation’s #1 VA Lender,” and Veterans United’s trick has worked. The lawsuit details accounts from multiple real estate and loan officers who routinely lose business to Veterans United because veteran and military customers believe they need to use Veterans United because it is affiliated with the VA. Cited agents and loan officers in the complaint say, “Veterans United’s steering practices are a disservice to its clients in the military.”

“These mortgage companies should be ashamed of their underhanded business tactics and are wholly unaffiliated with the military,” Berman said. “No owner, co-owner or founder has served in the military.”

“Blatant Steering”

The lawsuit also brings claims of violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) for allegedly fraudulent conduct resulting in Veterans United customers being steered away from loans with better interest rates and cheaper overall outcomes for homebuyers.

Veterans United has a network of affiliated agents throughout the country who do not work for Veterans United, but who receive referrals from Veterans United, the lawsuit states. If the lead closes on a house, the agents pay Veterans United a substantial proportion (around 35%) of their commission, according to attorneys. These agents are also required to steer their clients into using Veterans United for their home loans even if the terms of the loans are less favorable than other loans available to consumers. If the agents do not do so, they stop receiving leads, the lawsuit alleges.

“Defendants’ conduct as alleged herein violates federal statutes that seek to promote transparency and accountability in the real estate industry, in two respects,” the lawsuit states. “First, Veterans United’s practice of providing leads to agents in exchange for pushing clients to Veterans United Home Loans is blatant steering. Second, by requiring preferred agents to pay the undisclosed 35% fee, Defendants are further violating RESPA because Defendants are receiving a payment that is not in exchange for completing the property transaction. RESPA prohibits receiving payments that are not ‘in connection with a transaction involving a federally related mortgage loan.’”

Veterans United offers less financial aid packages compared to its competitors and its loans have higher interest rates, threatening to trap veteran homebuyers into subpar financial agreements that could have been avoided at a competing lender.

Find out more about the lawsuit against Veterans United alleging illegal steering practices.

About Hagens Berman

Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs’ rights complex litigation law firm with a tenacious drive for achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and fraud. Since its founding in 1993, the firm’s determination has earned it numerous national accolades, awards and titles of “Most Feared Plaintiff’s Firm,” MVPs and Trailblazers of class-action law. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.

Contacts

Media Contact
Ash Klann
pr@hbsslaw.com
206-623-9363

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points, and Powell said this was a risk management cut

The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points, and Powell said this was a risk management cut

PANews reported on September 18th, according to the Securities Times, that at 2:00 AM Beijing time on September 18th, the Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point interest rate cut, lowering the federal funds rate from 4.25%-4.50% to 4.00%-4.25%, in line with market expectations. The Fed's interest rate announcement triggered a sharp market reaction, with the three major US stock indices rising briefly before quickly plunging. The US dollar index plummeted, briefly hitting a new low since 2025, before rebounding sharply, turning a decline into an upward trend. The sharp market volatility was closely tied to the subsequent monetary policy press conference held by Federal Reserve Chairman Powell. He stated that the 50 basis point rate cut lacked broad support and that there was no need for a swift adjustment. Today's move could be viewed as a risk-management cut, suggesting the Fed will not enter a sustained cycle of rate cuts. Powell reiterated the Fed's unwavering commitment to maintaining its independence. Market participants are currently unaware of the risks to the Fed's independence. The latest published interest rate dot plot shows that the median expectation of Fed officials is to cut interest rates twice more this year (by 25 basis points each), one more than predicted in June this year. At the same time, Fed officials expect that after three rate cuts this year, there will be another 25 basis point cut in 2026 and 2027.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 06:54
SEC Approves Generic Listing Standards for Crypto ETFs

SEC Approves Generic Listing Standards for Crypto ETFs

In a bombshell filing, the SEC is prepared to allow generic listing standards for crypto ETFs. This would permit ETF listings without a specific case-by-case approval process. The filing’s language rests on cryptoassets that are commodities, not securities. However, the Commission is reclassifying many such assets, theoretically enabling an XRP ETF alongside many other new products. Why Generic Listing Standards Matter The SEC has been tacitly approving new crypto ETFs like XRP and DOGE-based products, but there hasn’t been an unambiguously clear signal of greater acceptance. Huge waves of altcoin ETF filings keep reaching the Commission, but there hasn’t been a corresponding show of confidence. Until today, that is, as the SEC just took a sweeping measure to approve generic listing standards for crypto ETFs: “[Several leading exchanges] filed with the SEC proposed rule changes to adopt generic listing standards for Commodity-Based Trust Shares. Each of the foregoing proposed rule changes… were subject to notice and comment. This order approves the Proposals on an accelerated basis,” the SEC’s filing claimed. The proposals came from the Nasdaq, CBOE, and NYSE Arca, which all the ETF issuers have been using to funnel their proposals. In other words, this decision on generic listing standards could genuinely transform crypto ETF approvals. A New Era for Crypto ETFs Specifically, these new standards would allow issuers to tailor-make compliant crypto ETF proposals. If these filings meet all the Commission’s criteria, the underlying ETFs could trade on the market without direct SEC approval. This would remove a huge bottleneck in the coveted ETF creation process. “By approving these generic listing standards, we are ensuring that our capital markets remain the best place in the world to engage in the cutting-edge innovation of digital assets. This approval helps to maximize investor choice and foster innovation by streamlining the listing process,” SEC Chair Paul Atkins claimed in a press release. The SEC has already been working on a streamlined approval process for crypto ETFs, but these generic listing standards could accomplish the task. This rule change would rely on considering tokens as commodities instead of securities, but federal regulators have been reclassifying assets like XRP. If these standards work as advertised, ETFs based on XRP, Solana, and many other cryptos could be coming very soon. This quiet announcement may have huge implications.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 06:14
South Korea Halts Trading as Global Markets Plunge

South Korea Halts Trading as Global Markets Plunge

The post South Korea Halts Trading as Global Markets Plunge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Korean Stock Exchange was forced to halt trading after the
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/05 07:04