The post STX Technical Analysis Feb 10 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. STX shows neutral momentum at RSI 40.77 level, confirming short-term bearish pressureThe post STX Technical Analysis Feb 10 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. STX shows neutral momentum at RSI 40.77 level, confirming short-term bearish pressure

STX Technical Analysis Feb 10

STX shows neutral momentum at RSI 40.77 level, confirming short-term bearish pressure with MACD’s negative histogram and positioning below EMA20; volume decline reinforces trend weakness.

Trend Status and Momentum Analysis

STX is trading at 0.26 dollars as of February 10, 2026, with a 3.47% decline in the last 24 hours, keeping the daily range limited between 0.25-0.27 dollars. Volume is moving at low levels of 14.24 million dollars, confirming the weakness in momentum. The overall trend direction is downward; the price remains below EMA20 (0.28 dollars) and the Supertrend indicator gives a bearish signal, with resistance clearly emerging at 0.35 dollars. In the confluence of momentum oscillators, RSI is wandering in the neutral zone, while the negative expansion of the MACD histogram increases selling pressure. In multi-timeframe (MTF) analysis, 13 strong levels were detected on 1D, 3D, and 1W charts: 2 supports/3 resistances on 1D, 2 supports/1 resistance on 3D, and 2 supports/4 resistances on 1W. This structure indicates the possibility of consolidation or a deeper pullback in the short term. Main supports are concentrated at 0.2527 (score 76/100) and 0.2208 (76/100), while resistances are at 0.2704 (68/100), 0.2984 (69/100), and 0.3368 (61/100). Lack of volume confirmation limits the trend’s strength, and selling tendency dominates in accumulation/distribution patterns.

RSI Indicator: Buy or Sell?

RSI Divergence Analysis

RSI (14) is at 40.77 level and positioned in the neutral zone (between 30-70), approaching the oversold (below 30) threshold but not yet reaching it. No regular bearish divergence is observed on the daily chart; since RSI stays at similar levels while price makes new lows, hidden bullish divergence potential is low. However, on the 4-hour timeframe, RSI reacting to the price bottom at 0.25 dollars without dropping to 35 can be monitored as a potential hidden bullish divergence signal – but it remains weak without volume confirmation. Weekly RSI is around 45 and neutrality dominates in the long-term trend; price may need to test the 0.22 support for divergence formation. Overall, RSI shows slowdown in momentum but does not produce a sell signal; bullish confirmation should be sought above 50.

Oversold/Overbought Zones

RSI at 40.77 is close to the oversold zone but not yet triggered. Historically, when STX’s RSI drops below 30, rebounds are seen, but in the current downtrend, this level may signal deep selling. The overbought zone above 70 is distant; it had risen to 65 in recent rallies but pulled back quickly. In momentum confluence, RSI shows a bearish tilt in line with MACD.

MACD Signals and Histogram Dynamics

MACD status is clearly bearish: Histogram is expanding in the negative zone, signal line remains below the MACD line. On the daily chart, the last crossover was downward and histogram bars are lengthening, confirming acceleration in selling momentum. Slight contraction of the histogram on 4-hour indicates short-term slowdown signal, but staying below the zero line prevents trend reversal. No divergence; histogram negativity progresses in parallel with price decline. Negative histogram supported by volume strengthens the distribution pattern. For a bullish signal, histogram should approach zero and turn positive – unlikely in the current structure.

EMA Systems and Trend Strength

Short-Term EMAs

Price is below EMA20 (0.28 dollars), confirming short-term bearish bias. Narrowing between EMA10 and EMA20 ribbon shows momentum loss; price dropping below the ribbon accelerated sales. Daily closes could not approach EMA50 (around 0.29), trend strength is weak.

Medium/Long-Term EMA Supports

EMA50 and EMA200 ribbon is downward sloping, price below both. Medium-term EMA100 (around 0.31) is acting as resistance. No squeeze formation in ribbon dynamics; expanding bearish ribbon supports the downtrend. Breaking EMA200 (above 0.35) is required for long-term recovery, unlikely with current momentum. Check detailed charts for STX Spot Analysis and STX Futures Analysis.

Bitcoin Correlation

Bitcoin is in downtrend at 69,447 dollars level with 2.25% decline; main supports at 68,343, 62,910, and 46,196 dollars. Resistances at 70,938, 77,357, and 85,375. BTC Supertrend gives bearish signal and rising dominance poses risk for altcoins. STX is highly correlated with BTC (0.85+); if BTC breaks 68K support, STX could accelerate to 0.22. If BTC passes 70K resistance, breathing room may emerge for STX, but current BTC weakness suppresses altcoin momentum. Key BTC levels: Support breakdown will trigger STX sales.

Momentum Result and Expectations

In momentum oscillators confluence, RSI neutrality, MACD negative histogram, and EMA ribbon bearish tilt keep STX weak in short-medium term. Even without volume confirmation, MTF levels make 0.2527 support critical; on breakdown, 0.2208 is targeted. For bullish scenario, 0.2704/0.2984 resistances must be surpassed, bullish target 0.4528 (28 points). Overall outlook is cautious bearish; long positions risky without RSI dropping below 30 or MACD histogram contraction. Momentum is weak in trend strength measurement, volume increase expected. Market volatility high, monitor levels.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/stx-technical-analysis-february-10-2026-rsi-macd-momentum

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Softer CPI keeps PBoC easing in play – TD Securities

Softer CPI keeps PBoC easing in play – TD Securities

The post Softer CPI keeps PBoC easing in play – TD Securities appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TD Securities expects China’s January CPI to slow, with its forecast
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/11 05:47
XRP price prediction – Odds of hitting the $2-level in February are…

XRP price prediction – Odds of hitting the $2-level in February are…

The post XRP price prediction – Odds of hitting the $2-level in February are… appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Like the broader crypto market, XRP’s relief
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/11 06:01