Rust 1.78 has upgraded its bundled LLVM to version 18, completing the announced u128/i128 ABI change for x86-32 and x86-64 targets. Distributors that use their own LLVM older than 18 may still face the calling convention bugs mentioned in that post.Rust 1.78 has upgraded its bundled LLVM to version 18, completing the announced u128/i128 ABI change for x86-32 and x86-64 targets. Distributors that use their own LLVM older than 18 may still face the calling convention bugs mentioned in that post.

Rust 1.78.0: What's In It?

2025/12/08 02:45

The Rust team is happy to announce a new version of Rust, 1.78.0. Rust is a programming language empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.

\ If you have a previous version of Rust installed via rustup, you can get 1.78.0 with:

$ rustup update stable

\ If you don't have it already, you can get rustup from the appropriate page on our website, and check out the detailed release notes for 1.78.0.

\ If you'd like to help us out by testing future releases, you might consider updating locally to use the beta channel (rustup default beta) or the nightly channel (rustup default nightly). Please report any bugs you might come across!

What's in 1.78.0 stable

Diagnostic attributes

Rust now supports a #[diagnostic] attribute namespace to influence compiler error messages. These are treated as hints which the compiler is not required to use, and it is also not an error to provide a diagnostic that the compiler doesn't recognize. This flexibility allows source code to provide diagnostics even when they're not supported by all compilers, whether those are different versions or entirely different implementations.

\ With this namespace comes the first supported attribute, #[diagnostic::on_unimplemented], which can be placed on a trait to customize the message when that trait is required but hasn't been implemented on a type. Consider the example given in the stabilization pull request:

#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented( message = "My Message for `ImportantTrait<{A}>` is not implemented for `{Self}`", label = "My Label", note = "Note 1", note = "Note 2" )] trait ImportantTrait<A> {} fn use_my_trait(_: impl ImportantTrait<i32>) {} fn main() { use_my_trait(String::new()); }

\ Previously, the compiler would give a builtin error like this:

error[E0277]: the trait bound `String: ImportantTrait<i32>` is not satisfied --> src/main.rs:12:18 | 12 | use_my_trait(String::new()); | ------------ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `ImportantTrait<i32>` is not implemented for `String` | | | required by a bound introduced by this call |

\ With #[diagnostic::on_unimplemented], its custom message fills the primary error line, and its custom label is placed on the source output. The original label is still written as help output, and any custom notes are written as well. (These exact details are subject to change.)

error[E0277]: My Message for `ImportantTrait<i32>` is not implemented for `String` --> src/main.rs:12:18 | 12 | use_my_trait(String::new()); | ------------ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ My Label | | | required by a bound introduced by this call | = help: the trait `ImportantTrait<i32>` is not implemented for `String` = note: Note 1 = note: Note 2

\ For trait authors, this kind of diagnostic is more useful if you can provide a better hint than just talking about the missing implementation itself. For example, this is an abridged sample from the standard library:

#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented( message = "the size for values of type `{Self}` cannot be known at compilation time", label = "doesn't have a size known at compile-time" )] pub trait Sized {}

\ For more information, see the reference section on the diagnostic tool attribute namespace.

Asserting unsafe preconditions

The Rust standard library has a number of assertions for the preconditions of unsafe functions, but historically they have only been enabled in #[cfg(debug_assertions)] builds of the standard library to avoid affecting release performance. However, since the standard library is usually compiled and distributed in release mode, most Rust developers weren't ever executing these checks at all.

\ Now, the condition for these assertions is delayed until code generation, so they will be checked depending on the user's own setting for debug assertions -- enabled by default in debug and test builds. This change helps users catch undefined behavior in their code, though the details of how much is checked are generally not stable.

\ For example, slice::from_raw_parts requires an aligned non-null pointer. The following use of a purposely-misaligned pointer has undefined behavior, and while if you were unlucky it may have appeared to "work" in the past, the debug assertion can now catch it:

fn main() { let slice: &[u8] = &[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]; let ptr = slice.as_ptr(); // Create an offset from `ptr` that will always be one off from `u16`'s correct alignment let i = usize::from(ptr as usize & 1 == 0); let slice16: &[u16] = unsafe { std::slice::from_raw_parts(ptr.add(i).cast::<u16>(), 2) }; dbg!(slice16); } thread 'main' panicked at library/core/src/panicking.rs:220:5: unsafe precondition(s) violated: slice::from_raw_parts requires the pointer to be aligned and non-null, and the total size of the slice not to exceed `isize::MAX` note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace thread caused non-unwinding panic. aborting.

Deterministic realignment

The standard library has a few functions that change the alignment of pointers and slices, but they previously had caveats that made them difficult to rely on in practice, if you followed their documentation precisely. Those caveats primarily existed as a hedge against const evaluation, but they're only stable for non-const use anyway. They are now promised to have consistent runtime behavior according to their actual inputs.

  • pointer::align_offset computes the offset needed to change a pointer to the given alignment. It returns usize::MAX if that is not possible, but it was previously permitted to always return usize::MAX, and now that behavior is removed.
  • slice::align_to and slice::align_to_mut both transmute slices to an aligned middle slice and the remaining unaligned head and tail slices. These methods now promise to return the largest possible middle part, rather than allowing the implementation to return something less optimal like returning everything as the head slice.

Stabilized APIs

  • impl Read for &Stdin
  • Accept non 'static lifetimes for several std::error::Error related implementations
  • Make impl<Fd: AsFd> impl take ?Sized
  • impl From<TryReserveError> for io::Error

\ These APIs are now stable in const contexts:

  • Barrier::new()

Compatibility notes

  • As previously announced, Rust 1.78 has increased its minimum requirement to Windows 10 for the following targets:
  • x86_64-pc-windows-msvc
  • i686-pc-windows-msvc
  • x86_64-pc-windows-gnu
  • i686-pc-windows-gnu
  • x86_64-pc-windows-gnullvm
  • i686-pc-windows-gnullvm
  • Rust 1.78 has upgraded its bundled LLVM to version 18, completing the announced u128/i128 ABI change for x86-32 and x86-64 targets. Distributors that use their own LLVM older than 18 may still face the calling convention bugs mentioned in that post.

Other changes

Check out everything that changed in Rust, Cargo, and Clippy.

Contributors to 1.78.0

Many people came together to create Rust 1.78.0. We couldn't have done it without all of you. Thanks!


The Rust Release Team

\ Also published here

\ Photo by Ubaid E. Alyafizi on Unsplash

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures

CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures

The post CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group will offer options based on the derivative markets on Solana (SOL) and XRP. The new markets will open on October 13, after regulatory approval.  CME Group will expand its crypto products with options on the futures markets of Solana (SOL) and XRP. The futures market will start on October 13, after regulatory review and approval.  The options will allow the trading of MicroSol, XRP, and MicroXRP futures, with expiry dates available every business day, monthly, and quarterly. The new products will be added to the existing BTC and ETH options markets. ‘The launch of these options contracts builds on the significant growth and increasing liquidity we have seen across our suite of Solana and XRP futures,’ said Giovanni Vicioso, CME Group Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products. The options contracts will have two main sizes, tracking the futures contracts. The new market will be suitable for sophisticated institutional traders, as well as active individual traders. The addition of options markets singles out XRP and SOL as liquid enough to offer the potential to bet on a market direction.  The options on futures arrive a few months after the launch of SOL futures. Both SOL and XRP had peak volumes in August, though XRP activity has slowed down in September. XRP and SOL options to tap both institutions and active traders Crypto options are one of the indicators of market attitudes, with XRP and SOL receiving a new way to gauge sentiment. The contracts will be supported by the Cumberland team.  ‘As one of the biggest liquidity providers in the ecosystem, the Cumberland team is excited to support CME Group’s continued expansion of crypto offerings,’ said Roman Makarov, Head of Cumberland Options Trading at DRW. ‘The launch of options on Solana and XRP futures is the latest example of the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:56
SEC Approves Decision Concerning Bitcoin and 9 Altcoins – The Dow Jones of Cryptocurrencies May Have Arrived

SEC Approves Decision Concerning Bitcoin and 9 Altcoins – The Dow Jones of Cryptocurrencies May Have Arrived

The post SEC Approves Decision Concerning Bitcoin and 9 Altcoins – The Dow Jones of Cryptocurrencies May Have Arrived appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. While the cryptocurrency market doesn’t yet have a comprehensive index like the Dow Jones or S&P 500, Bitwise is one step closer to filling this void. The company’s new exchange-traded product, Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW), has begun trading, offering individual investors and financial advisors access to the 10 largest crypto assets in a single product. BITW’s portfolio includes the following digital assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Solana, Chainlink, Litecoin, Cardano, Avalanche, Sui, and Polkadot. Bitwise CEO and co-founder Hunter Horsley told CNBC that this conversion makes the company the first to include altcoins like Cardano, Avalanche, Sui, and Polkadot, which don’t currently have spot ETFs, in an ETF from a major asset manager. “This step significantly broadens the investor base that can access various crypto assets,” Horsley said. “This is particularly important for assets without a spot ETF.” According to the CEO, this ETF also provides significant accessibility for smaller investors who invest through individual retirement accounts (IRAs) or pension funds and are only able to access ETFs. BITW, previously an index fund containing the same assets, has been converted to an ETF and is now listed on the stock exchange with $1.5 billion in assets under management. The ETF structure provides additional benefits to investors by offering greater trading flexibility, tax advantages, and lower costs, along with broader trading permissions. This development follows an expanded wave of ETFs that followed the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024. Since then, asset managers have sought approval for a wider range of ETFs, from altcoins like Sui and Aptos to Trump-themed tokens and memecoins like Dogecoin. However, as the market matures, crypto assets are beginning to take on their own dynamics, suggesting that broad-based products like BITW could offer a diversification tool similar…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/10 06:40