The post ConsenSys lawyer slams Senate draft: ‘Not a safe harbor’ for DeFi operators appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why has the Senate’s draft left DeFi open for review?  Lawmakers and industry players are yet to agree on how to regulate the sector.  What’s next for DeFi?  As per the proposal, DeFi operators remain at legal risk. It remains to be seen whether the industry lobby will push for lenient rules.  The DeFi issue could be a key hurdle to advancing the crypto market structure bill. In the much-awaited discussion draft from the Senate Agriculture Committee, the DeFi section has been largely left with a disclaimer, stating, “seeking further feedback.”  Source: Senate Agriculture Policy analysts noted that the limited DeFi provisions offer no “safe harbor” for developers or users. Bill Hughes, a lawyer at ConsenSys, said the proposal protects self-custody wallets and developers of open-source blockchain systems.  However, operators of DEX front-ends, lending protocol interfaces, platforms that route swaps, or anyone running systems that facilitate financial transactions can be sued for any wrongdoing. Source: X Hughes summarized the proposal as unfavorable for DeFi players,  “The rule applies only to personal use, not to persons acting as custodians, fiduciaries, or financial service providers for others…This isn’t a safe harbor for operating DeFi interfaces generally.” The DeFi dilemma The DeFi dilemma, pushed by Democrats, remains a central obstacle for the Senate Banking Committee as it prepares its own version of the market structure proposal. Under the two-tiered framework envisioned in the CLARITY Act, the CFTC would regulate commodities, derivatives, and custody aspects of crypto. However, securities, investor protection, stablecoins, DeFi, and other areas fall within the SEC’s purview.  At the Congress level, the Senate Banking Committee oversees the SEC, while the Agriculture Committee handles CFTC activities.  Now that the Agriculture is done with its part, focus will turn to the Banking Committee and harmonizing the DeFi regulation before it… The post ConsenSys lawyer slams Senate draft: ‘Not a safe harbor’ for DeFi operators appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why has the Senate’s draft left DeFi open for review?  Lawmakers and industry players are yet to agree on how to regulate the sector.  What’s next for DeFi?  As per the proposal, DeFi operators remain at legal risk. It remains to be seen whether the industry lobby will push for lenient rules.  The DeFi issue could be a key hurdle to advancing the crypto market structure bill. In the much-awaited discussion draft from the Senate Agriculture Committee, the DeFi section has been largely left with a disclaimer, stating, “seeking further feedback.”  Source: Senate Agriculture Policy analysts noted that the limited DeFi provisions offer no “safe harbor” for developers or users. Bill Hughes, a lawyer at ConsenSys, said the proposal protects self-custody wallets and developers of open-source blockchain systems.  However, operators of DEX front-ends, lending protocol interfaces, platforms that route swaps, or anyone running systems that facilitate financial transactions can be sued for any wrongdoing. Source: X Hughes summarized the proposal as unfavorable for DeFi players,  “The rule applies only to personal use, not to persons acting as custodians, fiduciaries, or financial service providers for others…This isn’t a safe harbor for operating DeFi interfaces generally.” The DeFi dilemma The DeFi dilemma, pushed by Democrats, remains a central obstacle for the Senate Banking Committee as it prepares its own version of the market structure proposal. Under the two-tiered framework envisioned in the CLARITY Act, the CFTC would regulate commodities, derivatives, and custody aspects of crypto. However, securities, investor protection, stablecoins, DeFi, and other areas fall within the SEC’s purview.  At the Congress level, the Senate Banking Committee oversees the SEC, while the Agriculture Committee handles CFTC activities.  Now that the Agriculture is done with its part, focus will turn to the Banking Committee and harmonizing the DeFi regulation before it…

ConsenSys lawyer slams Senate draft: ‘Not a safe harbor’ for DeFi operators

Key Takeaways

Why has the Senate’s draft left DeFi open for review? 

Lawmakers and industry players are yet to agree on how to regulate the sector. 

What’s next for DeFi? 

As per the proposal, DeFi operators remain at legal risk. It remains to be seen whether the industry lobby will push for lenient rules. 


The DeFi issue could be a key hurdle to advancing the crypto market structure bill. In the much-awaited discussion draft from the Senate Agriculture Committee, the DeFi section has been largely left with a disclaimer, stating, “seeking further feedback.” 

Source: Senate Agriculture

Policy analysts noted that the limited DeFi provisions offer no “safe harbor” for developers or users.

Bill Hughes, a lawyer at ConsenSys, said the proposal protects self-custody wallets and developers of open-source blockchain systems. 

However, operators of DEX front-ends, lending protocol interfaces, platforms that route swaps, or anyone running systems that facilitate financial transactions can be sued for any wrongdoing.

Source: X

Hughes summarized the proposal as unfavorable for DeFi players, 

The DeFi dilemma

The DeFi dilemma, pushed by Democrats, remains a central obstacle for the Senate Banking Committee as it prepares its own version of the market structure proposal.

Under the two-tiered framework envisioned in the CLARITY Act, the CFTC would regulate commodities, derivatives, and custody aspects of crypto. However, securities, investor protection, stablecoins, DeFi, and other areas fall within the SEC’s purview. 

At the Congress level, the Senate Banking Committee oversees the SEC, while the Agriculture Committee handles CFTC activities. 

Now that the Agriculture is done with its part, focus will turn to the Banking Committee and harmonizing the DeFi regulation before it can move to the Senate floor vote. 

But agreement on DeFi provisions will determine the pace of the bill’s progress, according to reporter Brendan Pedersen. 

Odds of passage rise after draft update

For its part, the DeFi Education Fund, an advocacy for developers in the space, hailed the protections in the proposal. 

Source: X

That said, the odds of passing the market structure bill, CLARITY Act, by 2025 recovered to 37% after the discussion draft update.

Over the past few days, the chances of this had dropped by 20%, suggesting that the market was likely pricing in the possibility of the bill extending into early 2026. 

Previous: Why is TRUMP’s price up today? $3.4M whale gains, $10 target & more…
Next: Analyzing why Bitmine’s $12.4B Ethereum bet matters now

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/consensys-lawyer-slams-senate-draft-not-a-safe-harbor-for-defi-operators/

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0006269
$0.0006269$0.0006269
-0.83%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

Exploring how the costs of a pandemic can lead to a self-enforcing lockdown in a networked economy, analyzing the resulting changes in network structure and the existence of stable equilibria.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:00
One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight

One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight

The post One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Frank Sinatra’s The World We Knew returns to the Jazz Albums and Traditional Jazz Albums charts, showing continued demand for his timeless music. Frank Sinatra performs on his TV special Frank Sinatra: A Man and his Music Bettmann Archive These days on the Billboard charts, Frank Sinatra’s music can always be found on the jazz-specific rankings. While the art he created when he was still working was pop at the time, and later classified as traditional pop, there is no such list for the latter format in America, and so his throwback projects and cuts appear on jazz lists instead. It’s on those charts where Sinatra rebounds this week, and one of his popular projects returns not to one, but two tallies at the same time, helping him increase the total amount of real estate he owns at the moment. Frank Sinatra’s The World We Knew Returns Sinatra’s The World We Knew is a top performer again, if only on the jazz lists. That set rebounds to No. 15 on the Traditional Jazz Albums chart and comes in at No. 20 on the all-encompassing Jazz Albums ranking after not appearing on either roster just last frame. The World We Knew’s All-Time Highs The World We Knew returns close to its all-time peak on both of those rosters. Sinatra’s classic has peaked at No. 11 on the Traditional Jazz Albums chart, just missing out on becoming another top 10 for the crooner. The set climbed all the way to No. 15 on the Jazz Albums tally and has now spent just under two months on the rosters. Frank Sinatra’s Album With Classic Hits Sinatra released The World We Knew in the summer of 1967. The title track, which on the album is actually known as “The World We Knew (Over and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:02
The U.S. Department of Justice files civil forfeiture lawsuit for over $225 million in crypto fraud funds

The U.S. Department of Justice files civil forfeiture lawsuit for over $225 million in crypto fraud funds

PANews reported on June 18 that according to an official announcement, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a civil forfeiture lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Share
PANews2025/06/18 23:59