For a React/Vue application, a typical non-optimized image can balloon to hundreds of megabytes.For a React/Vue application, a typical non-optimized image can balloon to hundreds of megabytes.

Shrink Your React Docker Image by 90% with Multi-Stage Builds

2025/10/11 12:00

An essential tenet of modern DevOps is creating small, efficient Docker images. For a React/Vue application, a typical non-optimized image can balloon to hundreds of megabytes.

The best dependency is no dependency.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

By implementing Multi-Stage Builds and other key techniques, you can often achieve a 10x reduction in size, significantly improving deployment speed, reducing registry storage, and shrinking your attack surface.

This guide provides a step-by-step approach to dramatically reduce your React / Vue application’s Docker image size, including how to embed your software version for runtime identification.

The Power of Multi-Stage Builds: From Bloat to Minimal

A single-stage Dockerfile for a React app requires the entire Node.js environment, dependencies, and build tools in the final image, even though they’re only needed for the build process.

The solution is the Multi-Stage Build pattern. It separates the heavy build environment from the minimal runtime environment.

By using a multi-stage approach, we only include the tiny Built Static Files and a minimal web server in the final image.

Optimized Multi-Stage Dockerfile

We will use two stages:

Builder Stage: Uses a larger node:lts-alpine image to install dependencies and run npm run build (you can use yarn also). This stage is discarded after the build.

Final Stage: Uses the ultra-minimal nginx:alpine image to serve the static files copied from the builder stage.

The nginx:alpine image is typically only ~20 MB — a massive reduction from a Node.js-based image!

Step-by-Step Optimization Guide

\ Step 1: Initialize the DockerfileCreate a file named Dockerfile in the root of your React project.

\ Step 2: The builder StageThis stage is responsible for all the heavy lifting — installing Node, fetching dependencies, and compiling the React application.

\

# Stage 1: The Builder Stage FROM node:lts-alpine AS builder  # Set the working directory inside the container WORKDIR /app  # Copy package.json and lock file first to leverage Docker's build cache # Only run npm install if package files change COPY package*.json ./ RUN npm install  # Copy all other source files COPY . .  # Run the build command - typically outputs to 'build' folder for Create-React-App RUN npm run build 

\ Optimization Notes for this Stage:

Minimal Base Image: We use node:lts-alpine instead of a full node:lts image. Alpine is a very small, security-focused Linux distribution.

Build Cache Leverage: Copying package*.json and running npm install before copying the rest of the source files ensures that Docker only re-runs the long npm install step if your dependencies change, not every time you change a source file.

\ Step 3: The final (Production) StageThis stage uses a lean, production-ready web server to host the built assets.

\

# Stage 2: The Final Production Stage FROM nginx:alpine  # Copy the build output from the 'builder' stage to the Nginx public directory # The 'build' directory is where 'npm run build' typically puts the static assets. COPY --from=builder /app/build /usr/share/nginx/html  # Expose the port Nginx runs on EXPOSE 80  # Command to start Nginx, serving the content CMD ["nginx", "-g", "daemon off;"] 

\ Key Optimization:

FROM nginx:alpine: Using an ultra-minimal image (around 20 MB) as the final layer.

COPY — from=builder: This is the magic of multi-stage builds. We only copy the small, compiled static files (/app/build) from the preceding stage, discarding the entire Node.js, node_modules, and build tool environment.

Highlighting the Current Software Version (DevOps Insight)

In DevOps, knowing the exact software version running in production is critical for debugging, rollbacks, and tracking.

We’ll use a Build Argument (ARG) to inject the version (e.g., from your CI/CD pipeline, Git tag, or Merge Request (MR) ID) into the image at build time, and then surface it in your application code.

\ Step 3.1: Pass the Version via Docker ARGModify the builder stage to accept a BUILD_VERSION argument:

\

# ... (Previous code) # Stage 1: The Builder Stage FROM node:lts-alpine AS builder # Define a build argument for the software version ARG BUILD_VERSION=unknown   WORKDIR /app  # ... (rest of Stage 1 code)  # Build the app, passing the version as a variable to React's build process # REACT_APP_VERSION is a standard pattern for exposing ENV vars to a React build RUN npm run build 

\ When building, you will pass the version:

\

# Example using a CI variable for the Merge Request ID MR_ID="mr-12345" docker build --build-arg BUILD_VERSION=${MR_ID} -t my-react-app:${MR_ID} . 

\ Step 3.2: Access the Version in React (App Build/MR Code)You need to configure your React build process (e.g., in your project’s .env file, webpack config, or a special script) to consume the Docker ARG value and embed it into the application’s environment variables.

For a standard Create-React-App setup, you usually pass environment variables to the npm run build command. Since we can’t directly use an ARG as an ENV in a single command, the common and cleanest pattern is to use a simple script or directly embed the variable during the RUN instruction.

The Crucial Dockerfile Code (Combined RUN for npm run build):

To ensure the build argument is passed as an environment variable visible to the React build script:

\

# Stage 1: The Builder Stage FROM node:lts-alpine AS builder # Define a build argument for the software version ARG BUILD_VERSION=unknown   # ... (other setup)  # **HIGHLIGHTED APP BUILD/MR CODE INJECTION** # Pass the BUILD_VERSION ARG as a REACT_APP_VERSION ENV to the build process RUN REACT_APP_VERSION=${BUILD_VERSION} npm run build  # Your app code (e.g., package.json scripts) should ensure this variable is embedded. 

\ The Corresponding React Application Code (e.g., in App.js or a Footer component):

The React app’s code uses the standard way of accessing build-time environment variables:

\

import React from 'react';  function Footer() {   // **HIGHLIGHTED APP BUILD/MR CODE**   const version = process.env.REACT_APP_VERSION || 'local-dev';    return (     <footer>       Running Software Version: **{version}** 🚀     </footer>   ); }  export default Footer; 

\ This ensures that the Merge Request ID, Git SHA, or any other critical version identifier is baked directly into the static assets, easily visible to developers or support teams.

Final Optimized Dockerfile or Fast Deployment Is a Small Deployment.

Here is the complete, size-optimized, multi-stage Dockerfile with version injection:

\

# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # STAGE 1: BUILDER # Uses a lean Node image to install dependencies and compile the React app # -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FROM node:lts-alpine AS builder  # Define a build argument for the version (default to 'unknown' if not provided) ARG BUILD_VERSION=unknown  WORKDIR /app  # Copy package files first to enable caching of npm install COPY package*.json ./ RUN npm install  # Copy application source code COPY . .  # Pass the BUILD_VERSION as an environment variable during the build # This value will be baked into the static assets (e.g., accessible via process.env.REACT_APP_VERSION) # **HIGHLIGHTED APP BUILD/MR CODE** RUN REACT_APP_VERSION=${BUILD_VERSION} npm run build  # -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # STAGE 2: FINAL PRODUCTION IMAGE # Uses a minimal Nginx image to serve the compiled static files # -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FROM nginx:alpine  # Copy the built React application files from the 'builder' stage # This step discards the entire Node.js environment, reducing size by >90% COPY --from=builder /app/build /usr/share/nginx/html  # Expose the standard HTTP port EXPOSE 80  # Start Nginx CMD ["nginx", "-g", "daemon off;"] 

\ By following this approach, you move from a massive, single-stage image (often 1 GB+) to a lean, final image powered by Nginx Alpine (typically < 50 MB) — easily achieving our 10x size reduction goal.

Conclusion: Ship Smart, Not Heavy

We’ve covered a lot of ground, from minimal base images to the genius of multi-stage builds. The ultimate takeaway is this: in the world of containers, less is more, and every megabyte counts.

By adopting the principles discussed — choosing an Alpine pencil case over a Debian suitcase, doing your cleanup in one layer, and using a .dockerignore file as your image’s velvet rope — you’re not just saving disk space; you’re buying back precious deployment time. You’re giving your CI/CD pipeline a fresh pair of running shoes.

Remember the DevOps mantra: “You build it, you run it.” A lean image is a reliable image, and reliability is the cornerstone of great operations. The effort you put in today to optimize your Dockerfile is a payment against future technical debt.

This journey of continuous improvement is not a destination, but a never-ending process.

Let’s Keep the Conversation Flowing

This article is just the tip of the iceberg. The best optimization is the one that fits your specific stack.

Got a tough image you just slimmed down? I’d love to hear your “honey, I shrunk the Docker” success story.

Don’t let this discussion be “out of sight, out of mind.” Feel free to reach out via LinkedIn or X.Com

Happy Containerizing!

\

시장 기회
Wrapped REACT 로고
Wrapped REACT 가격(REACT)
$0.05239
$0.05239$0.05239
+0.36%
USD
Wrapped REACT (REACT) 실시간 가격 차트
면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, service@support.mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

추천 콘텐츠

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
공유하기
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
USDC Treasury mints 250 million new USDC on Solana

USDC Treasury mints 250 million new USDC on Solana

PANews reported on September 17 that according to Whale Alert , at 23:48 Beijing time, USDC Treasury minted 250 million new USDC (approximately US$250 million) on the Solana blockchain .
공유하기
PANews2025/09/17 23:51
US S&P Global Manufacturing PMI declines to 51.8, Services PMI falls to 52.9 in December

US S&P Global Manufacturing PMI declines to 51.8, Services PMI falls to 52.9 in December

The post US S&P Global Manufacturing PMI declines to 51.8, Services PMI falls to 52.9 in December appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The business activity in
공유하기
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 23:24