The relationship between banks and fintech startups has undergone a fundamental shift. A decade ago, the narrative was one of disruption, with fintech companiesThe relationship between banks and fintech startups has undergone a fundamental shift. A decade ago, the narrative was one of disruption, with fintech companies

Why 75% of Banks Now Collaborate With Fintech Startups

2026/03/24 07:28
6 min di lettura
Per feedback o dubbi su questo contenuto, contattateci all'indirizzo crypto.news@mexc.com.

The relationship between banks and fintech startups has undergone a fundamental shift. A decade ago, the narrative was one of disruption, with fintech companies positioning themselves as replacements for traditional banking. Today, roughly 75% of banks worldwide actively collaborate with fintech startups, according to research from KPMG and the World Economic Forum. The antagonistic dynamic has given way to a symbiotic relationship where both sides benefit.

This shift did not happen by accident. Banks discovered that building technology in-house was expensive, slow, and often produced inferior results compared to partnering with specialised fintech companies. Fintech startups learned that scaling financial services requires access to banking infrastructure, regulatory licences, and established customer trust that takes decades to build. Collaboration became the pragmatic choice for both sides.

Why 75% of Banks Now Collaborate With Fintech Startups

Why Banks Turned to Fintech Partnerships

The primary driver of bank-fintech collaboration is speed. Banks operate on technology cycles measured in years. A major core banking upgrade might take three to five years and cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Fintech partnerships allow banks to deploy new capabilities in months rather than years. A bank that wants to offer real-time payments, digital onboarding, or AI-powered customer service can partner with a fintech provider rather than building from scratch.

Cost pressure is the second major factor. Traditional banks spend between 15% and 25% of their revenue on technology, according to Gartner. Despite these enormous budgets, much of the spending goes toward maintaining legacy systems rather than building new capabilities. Fintech partnerships allow banks to redirect technology investment toward innovation rather than maintenance. The fintech company handles the specialised development, and the bank integrates the solution into its existing infrastructure.

Customer expectations are the third driver. Bank customers, particularly younger demographics, expect digital experiences that match what they receive from consumer technology companies. Banks that cannot deliver seamless mobile banking, instant payments, and personalised financial insights risk losing customers to digital-first competitors. Fintech partnerships enable banks to meet these expectations without building every capability internally.

What Collaboration Looks Like in Practice

Bank-fintech collaboration takes many forms. The simplest is vendor relationships, where banks purchase fintech products or services. A bank might use a fintech company’s fraud detection system, digital onboarding platform, or payment processing engine. These relationships are transactional and focused on specific capabilities.

Strategic partnerships go deeper. A bank and a fintech company might co-develop a product, share data, or jointly serve a customer segment. For example, Goldman Sachs partnered with Apple to launch the Apple Card, combining Goldman’s banking licence and credit capabilities with Apple’s consumer technology platform. Similar partnerships exist between banks and fintech companies across payments, lending, and wealth management.

Investment relationships represent another form of collaboration. Many large banks operate venture capital arms that invest in fintech startups. Citi Ventures, HSBC’s innovation team, and Barclays’ accelerator programme all provide funding, mentorship, and potential integration opportunities to early-stage fintech companies. These investments give banks early access to emerging technologies while providing startups with capital and credibility.

Banking-as-a-service arrangements represent the most integrated form of collaboration. Banks provide their regulatory licences, deposit infrastructure, and payment rails to fintech companies, which then build customer-facing products on top. This model allows fintech companies to offer banking products without obtaining their own licences, while banks earn revenue from infrastructure they have already built.

Where the Partnerships Are Concentrated

Certain areas of banking attract more fintech collaboration than others. Payments is the most active category, with banks partnering with fintech companies for real-time payments, cross-border transfers, and merchant acquiring services. Digital identity and customer onboarding is the second most active area, as banks seek to reduce friction in account opening while maintaining regulatory compliance.

Lending partnerships are growing rapidly, particularly in small business lending and consumer credit. Banks use fintech platforms to reach borrower segments they cannot serve efficiently through traditional channels. The fintech company provides the technology platform and customer acquisition, while the bank provides the capital and regulatory framework.

Compliance and regulatory technology is another growing area. Anti-money laundering, know-your-customer, and transaction monitoring all require sophisticated technology that fintech companies often provide more effectively than internal bank teams. Regulatory requirements continue to increase in complexity, making these partnerships increasingly valuable.

Challenges in Bank-Fintech Collaboration

Despite the growth in partnerships, significant challenges remain. Cultural differences between banks and fintech startups create friction. Banks prioritise risk management, regulatory compliance, and process consistency. Fintech companies prioritise speed, experimentation, and user experience. Bridging these different organisational cultures requires effort from both sides.

Technology integration is often more difficult than anticipated. Connecting a modern fintech platform to a bank’s legacy core banking system can be complex and time-consuming. Data formats, security protocols, and processing workflows may be incompatible. The integration challenge is one of the main reasons bank-fintech partnerships sometimes fail to deliver expected results.

Regulatory uncertainty also creates challenges. Banks are responsible for the compliance of their partners, even when the fintech company is providing the customer-facing service. This third-party risk management requirement means banks must conduct extensive due diligence on their fintech partners and monitor their ongoing compliance. For fintech startups, meeting these requirements can be burdensome and expensive.

The Direction of the Relationship

The 75% collaboration rate will likely continue to increase. The few banks that do not partner with fintech companies tend to be smaller institutions with limited technology budgets or banks in markets where fintech ecosystems are less developed. As fintech infrastructure matures and integration becomes easier, even these holdouts are likely to adopt partnership strategies.

The nature of partnerships is also evolving. Early collaborations were often experimental, with banks testing fintech solutions in limited pilots. Increasingly, fintech partnerships are becoming core to bank strategy, embedded in technology roadmaps and business plans. The distinction between bank and fintech is blurring as both sides adopt characteristics of the other. Banks are becoming more technology-driven, and fintech companies are becoming more regulated. The result is a financial services ecosystem that is more collaborative, more innovative, and better equipped to serve customers than either side could achieve alone.

Comments
Disclaimer: gli articoli ripubblicati su questo sito provengono da piattaforme pubbliche e sono forniti esclusivamente a scopo informativo. Non riflettono necessariamente le opinioni di MEXC. Tutti i diritti rimangono agli autori originali. Se ritieni che un contenuto violi i diritti di terze parti, contatta crypto.news@mexc.com per la rimozione. MEXC non fornisce alcuna garanzia in merito all'accuratezza, completezza o tempestività del contenuto e non è responsabile per eventuali azioni intraprese sulla base delle informazioni fornite. Il contenuto non costituisce consulenza finanziaria, legale o professionale di altro tipo, né deve essere considerato una raccomandazione o un'approvazione da parte di MEXC.

Potrebbe anche piacerti

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Condividi
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
From Early Trading Losses to Global Impact: Somesh’s Journey to Building an Int’l Trading Community

From Early Trading Losses to Global Impact: Somesh’s Journey to Building an Int’l Trading Community

When Somesh started trading at 19, he lost nearly everything in three weeks. Today, he’s one of the most-followed day traders in the world with over one million
Condividi
Techbullion2026/03/24 13:12
USD/JPY Forecast: Critical Surge to 158.80 as Bulls Face Decisive 200-EMA Test

USD/JPY Forecast: Critical Surge to 158.80 as Bulls Face Decisive 200-EMA Test

BitcoinWorld USD/JPY Forecast: Critical Surge to 158.80 as Bulls Face Decisive 200-EMA Test TOKYO, May 2025 – The USD/JPY currency pair has surged decisively into
Condividi
bitcoinworld2026/03/24 13:05