The post $100M in crypto shifted by BlackRock – Panic move or just some rebalancing? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. When BlackRock moved nearly $100M in BitcoinThe post $100M in crypto shifted by BlackRock – Panic move or just some rebalancing? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. When BlackRock moved nearly $100M in Bitcoin

$100M in crypto shifted by BlackRock – Panic move or just some rebalancing?

2026/03/20 13:11
3 min di lettura
Per feedback o dubbi su questo contenuto, contattateci all'indirizzo crypto.news@mexc.com.

When BlackRock moved nearly $100M in Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH] to Coinbase, the immediate reaction was fear of a sell-off. However, it’s not that straightforward. 

The firm deposited 930 BTC worth $65.48M and 12,687 ETH worth $27.75M into Coinbase, with more deposits likely.

Source: Onchain Lens/X

However, these transfers are most likely part of ETF operations, where assets are routinely shifted between cold storage and exchanges to manage inflows, outflows, and rebalancing.

Rather than signaling a dump, this reflects how large institutions operate in crypto today. 

However, even if the intention isn’t bearish, the effect can still be negative in the short term. When large amounts of crypto are moved to exchanges like Coinbase Prime, it increases the chances of selling.

This adds pressure on prices and can trigger panic or quick drops, especially if the market is already in the “Extreme Fear” zone.

Source: Alternative

When should you actually worry?

Needless to say, one transfer alone isn’t a major red flag, but it becomes concerning if a pattern forms. This pattern includes repeated large deposits, consistent ETF outflows, and prices falling on high volume. 

If these signals appear together, it could point to real institutional selling pressure. Simply put, for now, the market might just be cautious, not panicked.

Institutions like BlackRock are adjusting their positions, while retail traders are reacting quickly to price moves, creating an unstable market.

Market trends are difficult and all over the place

Even though BlackRock’s stock is strong, crypto prices have been falling. At the time of writing, Bitcoin was down about 4%, with Ethereum down even more.

In fact, prices are moving quickly up and down, evidence of emotional, short-term trading rather than long-term confidence.

Ethereum, in particular, has been seeing sharp swings due to leveraged trades. Indicators like RSI show that small rallies don’t last long either. 

Source: Santiment

Additionally, the MVRV ratio revealed the market was stuck in a cycle, with prices rising briefly, traders taking profits, and prices falling again. In fact, neither buyers nor sellers seemed to be in control. 

Source: Santiment

Moreover, on 18 March, BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) saw $33.9 million in outflows, ending a 7-day inflow streak, while its Ethereum ETF (ETHA) recorded a smaller $1.3 million outflow.

These amounts may seem small, but they likely explain why BlackRock moved assets to Coinbase to sell and meet investor withdrawals.

Not the first time…

This isn’t new. A similar move happened in December 2025 when over $125 million in Bitcoin was sent to Coinbase under the same conditions. So, this isn’t panic selling, it’s simply a response to investors pulling money out.

Instead of guessing whether BlackRock is bullish or bearish, the key thing to watch is ETF outflows. If withdrawals continue, selling pressure in the market is likely to persist.


Final Summary

  • BlackRock’s $100M transfer isn’t panic selling, but a market move driven by ETF inflows and outflows.
  • Until demand returns, ETF-driven selling pressure is likely to keep markets under stress.

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/100m-in-crypto-shifted-by-blackrock-panic-move-or-just-some-rebalancing/

Opportunità di mercato
Logo Movement
Valore Movement (MOVE)
$0.02042
$0.02042$0.02042
-0.48%
USD
Grafico dei prezzi in tempo reale di Movement (MOVE)
Disclaimer: gli articoli ripubblicati su questo sito provengono da piattaforme pubbliche e sono forniti esclusivamente a scopo informativo. Non riflettono necessariamente le opinioni di MEXC. Tutti i diritti rimangono agli autori originali. Se ritieni che un contenuto violi i diritti di terze parti, contatta crypto.news@mexc.com per la rimozione. MEXC non fornisce alcuna garanzia in merito all'accuratezza, completezza o tempestività del contenuto e non è responsabile per eventuali azioni intraprese sulla base delle informazioni fornite. Il contenuto non costituisce consulenza finanziaria, legale o professionale di altro tipo, né deve essere considerato una raccomandazione o un'approvazione da parte di MEXC.

Potrebbe anche piacerti

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Condividi
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Zano Surges 22% as Privacy Coins See Revival: Why ZANO is Trending Today

Zano Surges 22% as Privacy Coins See Revival: Why ZANO is Trending Today

Privacy-focused cryptocurrency Zano has surged 22% in the past 24 hours, reaching $9.41 with trading volume jumping to $1.87 million. We analyze the on-chain metrics
Condividi
Blockchainmagazine2026/03/20 21:06
Trump's latest foray condemned for heaping even more pain on farmers

Trump's latest foray condemned for heaping even more pain on farmers

Farmers across the country warned they cannot survive for much longer as the Iran war worsens the fuel and fertilizer stocks. Industry experts said that already
Condividi
Rawstory2026/03/20 21:45