In dismissing the case, the Sandiganbayan rules that the long delay violated the remaining defendants' right to a speedy trialIn dismissing the case, the Sandiganbayan rules that the long delay violated the remaining defendants' right to a speedy trial

1987 coco levy case that involved Marcoses dismissed over gov’t delay

2026/03/19 11:00
3 min di lettura
Per feedback o dubbi su questo contenuto, contattateci all'indirizzo crypto.news@mexc.com.

MANILA, Philippines – The anti-graft court on Tuesday, March 17, dismissed a 1987 coconut levy case that originally involved as defendants the late dictator Ferdinand E. Marcos, former first lady Imelda Marcos, and the late businessman Eduardo Cojuangco Jr., citing the government’s failure to actively pursue the case.

Other original defendants included the late senator Juan Ponce Enrile, the late former Zamboanga City mayor Maria Clara Lobregat, Enrique M. Cojuangco, Marcos O. Cojuangco, Rafael Abello, and Eduardo’s firm, Agricultural Investors Incorporated (AII). Enrile and Lobregat were named because they served on the board of the state-owned United Coconut Planters Bank (UCPB).

The Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) had accused the defendants of conspiring to defraud the government of P426 million invested by AII in a 1974 project to produce hybrid coconut seedlings on Bugsuk Island, Palawan.

The 2nd Division of the Sandiganbayan dismissed the case against the remaining defendants – Enrique Cojuangco, Marcos O. Cojuangco, Abello, and AII. It stated that the long delay violated the their right to a speedy trial.

The court said Civil Case No. 0033-C, one of eight cases derived from the original complaint, had dragged on for more than 30 years, including a third amendment.

“Such a period is unreasonably excessive by any standard,” read part of the court’s ruling.

The Sandiganbayan also noted that the government “failed to prosecute this case within a reasonable timeframe” as lawyers repeatedly filed motions for extension.

“While the court recognizes the complexity of the issues and the voluminous records in this case, these factors do not sufficiently justify the 30-year long delay which prejudiced the defendants. During this period, the defendants have been put under a cloud of anxiety, suspicion, and often, hostility as the case loomed over them,” the court stated.

What was the case about?

The Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) had accused the defendants of conspiracy to defraud the government of P426 million, which AII invested in the 1974 project to grow hybrid coconut seedlings on Bugsuk Island, Palawan.

The money came from coconut farmers’ contributions to the Coconut Industry Development Fund (CIDF). The fund, part of the coconut levy, was first managed by the National Investment Development Corporation (NIDC) until 1978, when it was transferred to the UCPB.

UCPB officials were accused of not contesting P532.4 million in liquidated damages against the CIDF. On September 14, 1980, the bank reserved P750 million to cover any damages AII might face from the project. The project ended when former president Marcos terminated the coconut levy on August 27, 1982. UCPB then ended its agreement with AII, prompting the company to go to arbitration.

Prosecutors said the case went to a board of arbitrators with lawyers Esteban Bautista for AII, Aniceto Dideles for UCPB, and UP Law Professor Bartolome Carale as chairman. The PCGG questioned this because Eduardo Cojuangco “was president and chairman of AII while also serving as president and CEO of UCPB.”

On March 29, 1983, the board awarded P532.39 million to AII as “liquidated damages” and forfeited P426.26 million already given by NIDC. UCPB was also charged P150,000 for arbitration. 

A regional court in Makati subsequently upheld the ruling, which PCGG said the bank allowed to lapse without appeal. – Rappler.com

Opportunità di mercato
Logo COCO BSC
Valore COCO BSC (COCO)
$0.19858
$0.19858$0.19858
-0.09%
USD
Grafico dei prezzi in tempo reale di COCO BSC (COCO)
Disclaimer: gli articoli ripubblicati su questo sito provengono da piattaforme pubbliche e sono forniti esclusivamente a scopo informativo. Non riflettono necessariamente le opinioni di MEXC. Tutti i diritti rimangono agli autori originali. Se ritieni che un contenuto violi i diritti di terze parti, contatta crypto.news@mexc.com per la rimozione. MEXC non fornisce alcuna garanzia in merito all'accuratezza, completezza o tempestività del contenuto e non è responsabile per eventuali azioni intraprese sulla base delle informazioni fornite. Il contenuto non costituisce consulenza finanziaria, legale o professionale di altro tipo, né deve essere considerato una raccomandazione o un'approvazione da parte di MEXC.

Potrebbe anche piacerti

World Gold Council’s Pivotal Framework Promises Unprecedented Market Trust

World Gold Council’s Pivotal Framework Promises Unprecedented Market Trust

The post World Gold Council’s Pivotal Framework Promises Unprecedented Market Trust appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tokenized Gold Revolution: World Gold Council
Condividi
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/20 03:58
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Condividi
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Shiba Inu Price Prediction 2026: SHIB Fights to Reclaim Its Glory While Pepeto Offers the 150x Early Window That SHIB Already Closed

Shiba Inu Price Prediction 2026: SHIB Fights to Reclaim Its Glory While Pepeto Offers the 150x Early Window That SHIB Already Closed

A truck driver put $650 into Shiba Inu in 2020 and quit his job after his bag grew to $1.7 million. Two brothers invested $7,900 during the COVID lockdowns and
Condividi
Blockonomi2026/03/20 04:32