A new debate is growing around the Digital Asset Market Structure CLARITY Act. It’s a proposed law that aims to regulate the crypto industry in the United StatesA new debate is growing around the Digital Asset Market Structure CLARITY Act. It’s a proposed law that aims to regulate the crypto industry in the United States

Gnosis Co-Founder Warns Clarity Act Favors Big Finance

2026/03/16 17:51
3 min di lettura
Per feedback o dubbi su questo contenuto, contattateci all'indirizzo crypto.news@mexc.com.

A new debate is growing around the Digital Asset Market Structure CLARITY Act. It’s a proposed law that aims to regulate the crypto industry in the United States. While the bill tries to bring clear rules to digital assets. Some experts believe it could also change how the crypto ecosystem works.

One of those critics is Dr. Friederike Ernst, co-founder of the Gnosis blockchain protocol. In a recent interview with CoinTelegraph, Ernst said the bill could shift control of crypto toward large financial institutions. She warned that the structure of the bill may push more crypto activity. Through banks and other big financial players. If that happens, the open and decentralized nature of blockchain networks could slowly weaken.

The CLARITY Act Tries to Define Crypto Rules

The CLARITY Act was introduced in 2025. Its main goal is to create clearer rules for digital assets. For years, crypto companies in the U.S. have faced confusion about regulation. Many projects are unsure whether their tokens should be treated as securities or commodities.

The proposed law tries to solve that problem. It would divide oversight between two regulators. The SEC would oversee tokens that qualify as securities. Meanwhile, the CFTC would regulate tokens. That functions more like a commodity. Supporters say this approach could remove uncertainty. This will help the crypto market grow under clear legal guidelines.

Critics Say the Bill May Favor Large Institutions

Despite these goals, Dr. Friederike Ernst believes the bill could have unintended effects. She explained that the proposal assumes most crypto activity should pass through intermediaries. Such as exchanges, financial companies or other regulated institutions. If that structure becomes the norm, large financial firms could gain much more influence over the industry.

Gnosis co-founder warned that power could become concentrated in the hands of only a few big players. This would look very similar to the traditional financial system. For many people in the crypto community, that idea goes against the original purpose of blockchain technology.

Blockchain Was Built Around User Ownership

Dr. Friederike Ernst also highlighted what she believes is the true breakthrough of blockchain networks. In many crypto systems, users are not just customers. They can also become owners and participants in the network. People can hold tokens, vote on governance decisions and help support the ecosystem. 

This structure allows communities to shape how a network grows. But Gnosis co-founder said forcing activity through financial institutions could slowly change that model. Instead of acting as stakeholders, users may end up behaving more like regular customers again.

The Debate Over Crypto’s Future

The discussion around the CLARITY Act shows a larger debate inside the crypto industry. Some experts believe stronger regulation is necessary for long term growth. Clear rules could encourage institutional investment and improve market stability. Others worry that too much regulation could undermine the principles. 

That made crypto unique in the first place. For now, lawmakers continue to discuss the bill as the industry watches closely. Whether the CLARITY Act strengthens the crypto ecosystem or reshapes it toward traditional finance remains an open question.

The post Gnosis Co-Founder Warns Clarity Act Favors Big Finance appeared first on Coinfomania.

Opportunità di mercato
Logo The AI Prophecy
Valore The AI Prophecy (ACT)
$0.01456
$0.01456$0.01456
+0.83%
USD
Grafico dei prezzi in tempo reale di The AI Prophecy (ACT)
Disclaimer: gli articoli ripubblicati su questo sito provengono da piattaforme pubbliche e sono forniti esclusivamente a scopo informativo. Non riflettono necessariamente le opinioni di MEXC. Tutti i diritti rimangono agli autori originali. Se ritieni che un contenuto violi i diritti di terze parti, contatta crypto.news@mexc.com per la rimozione. MEXC non fornisce alcuna garanzia in merito all'accuratezza, completezza o tempestività del contenuto e non è responsabile per eventuali azioni intraprese sulla base delle informazioni fornite. Il contenuto non costituisce consulenza finanziaria, legale o professionale di altro tipo, né deve essere considerato una raccomandazione o un'approvazione da parte di MEXC.

Potrebbe anche piacerti

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

The first-ever ETFs for XRP and Dogecoin are expected to launch in the US tomorrow. Here's what you need to know. Continue Reading: And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow
Condividi
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:33
Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

BitcoinWorld Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience ZURICH, March 2025 – The Swiss National Bank faces mounting
Condividi
bitcoinworld2026/03/16 23:10
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Condividi
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26