'Key red line' identified that could crack apart MAGA coalition: 'People worry'

President Donald Trump's media allies have been openly revolting over his decision to launch joint military operations with Israel against Iran, and panelists on "CNN This Morning" identified a major move that could crack his coalition apart.

Host Audie Cornish played clips of podcasters Joe Rogan and Megyn Kelly – whose name she underlined with a contemptuous laugh – criticizing the war, which Rogan called a betrayal of Trump's campaign promises and Kelly suggested served Israel's interests more than the U.S., and she noted her panelists' reactions to those comments.

"Audible groans from you here," Cornish said. "Tell me, help me understand the nuance of your reaction."

Former State Department official Joel Rubin called Kelly's criticism openly antisemitic, and the Atlantic Council's Alex Plitsas agreed, and Cornish asked whether Trump would be able to hold his coalition together as he had during past internal disputes.

"In the meantime Trump says what he has said whenever it comes to run, frankly, is MAGA is Trump, right?" Cornish said. "Like that, he is the one who dictates what 'America first' is, and it does seem like in some of the polling, Republicans are more or less with him. So what I can't tell is if I'm looking at a couple of media voices out there for clicks, being contrarian, or if this represents an actual break that we could see in the coming weeks."

The Atlantic's Vivian Salama argued that rising gas prices represented a real political danger to the White House, but she said that likely would not be the breaking point.

"The White House knows that the longer this conflict continues and the more pain that people feel at the pump, the more pain they feel at the grocery store, if inflation starts to go up again, then you will start to feel like it's a broader phenomenon," Salama said. "You know, what you see in the markets it tends to be sort of a precursor to what voters end up feeling and so they want this to be they want to get in and out. They want it to be, you know, a short term, you know, a short-term pain for long-term benefit."

Cornish identified a real-life worry felt by many families as the Trump administration refuses to rule out the possibility of deploying troops on the ground in Iran.

"Tell people out there, check in on the sons, in particular, in your life," Cornish said. "I'm hearing people worry about a draft. I'm hearing people – oh, is that what you're hearing, too?"

"A hundred percent," Salama said. "I've been hearing it constantly for the last couple of days."

Plitsas, a national security analyst and Middle East expert, tried to alleviate those concerns.

"We're not going to see a draft, " Plitsas said. "The military footprint, I think we can talk about in terms of intentions, words are one thing. You actually have to have capabilities to back up what you're talking about, [and] there are no infantry divisions mobilized anywhere. There are no ground forces."

"But it speaks to the level of fear and misunderstanding they also have about the intent of the White House," Cornish pointed out.

Rubin identified that as the likely political breaking.

"That's the key red line, as well, for the Rogans of the world," Rubin said. "Right now, the Republicans, broadly speaking, support this war but if we're talking about troops and boots on the ground, that's where the Rogan argument really comes into force. He says, you broke a promise, and that's where I think we see Republican support disappear."

- YouTube youtu.be