Customers of defunct crypto exchange FTX are accusing Fenwick & West of direct involvement in the exchange's fraudulent activity through the creation of a structure that enabled fraud and money laundering, according to a filing on Monday.Customers of defunct crypto exchange FTX are accusing Fenwick & West of direct involvement in the exchange's fraudulent activity through the creation of a structure that enabled fraud and money laundering, according to a filing on Monday.

FTX customers file lawsuit against Fenwick & West over involvement in exchange collapse

2025/08/13 06:45
3 min di lettura
Per feedback o dubbi su questo contenuto, contattateci all'indirizzo crypto.news@mexc.com.
  • FTX investors filed an amended lawsuit against law firm Fenwick & West, claiming the firm was crucial in the exchange's fraudulent activities.
  • The lawsuit claims Fenwick & West devised the legal structure that allowed FTX to loot customer funds.
  • The firm also allegedly helped manage and represent "clearly conflicted companies" without any legal safeguards, according to the filing.

Customers of defunct crypto exchange FTX are accusing Fenwick & West of direct involvement in the exchange's fraudulent activity through the creation of a structure that enabled fraud and money laundering, according to a filing on Monday.

FTX customers sue Fenwick & West for alleged involvement with the exchange's criminal activities

Customers are alleging that Silicon Valley law firm Fenwick & West had a direct involvement in the criminal activities of defunct crypto exchange FTX, according to a filing on Monday to a District Court in the Southern District of Florida.

The investors claim that Sam Bankman-Fried's criminal trial and FTX's bankruptcy proceedings have uncovered evidence showing that "Fenwick played a key and crucial role in the most important aspects of why and how the FTX fraud was accomplished."

The filing indicates that Fenwick had "actual knowledge of the FTX fraud, and provided 'substantial assistance'." Investors argued that the firm allegedly created and approved structures that permitted the looting of millions of dollars in customer funds by convicted FTX insiders.

"Fenwick agreed to create, managed and represented clearly conflicted companies (such as Alameda Research, FTX, North Dimension, etc.), which purposefully had no safeguards to prevent the billions of dollars that were admittedly stolen," the filing stated.

It also claims that FTX and founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) used Fenwick's status and reputation to gain credibility and attract investment from venture capital firms.

Fenwick & West served as one of 130 different law firms retained by FTX before its collapse in 2022 and is the only named firm in the amended filing as an accomplice with the exchange and its founder.

After reviewing more than 200,000 documents, an Independent Examiner in the FTX bankruptcy concluded that Fenwick was "deeply intertwined in nearly every aspect of FTX Group's fraud and wrongdoing," according to the filing.

During his trial, SBF claimed he relied on legal advice from Fenwick & West on many business matters, including communication and compliance policies, suggesting that some of his actions were based on legal counsel.

However, Fenwick reportedly denied the claims from SBF and FTX customers, stating that it only provided standard legal services to the FTX Group. It also claims that under the law, it cannot be held responsible for the alleged misconduct.

FTX filed for bankruptcy in November 2022 after allegedly misappropriating customer funds and engaging in high-risk investments through its sister trading firm Alameda Research. Following the bankruptcy proceedings, Sam Bankman-Fried was arrested and later convicted in 2023, resulting in a 25-year prison sentence.


Disclaimer: gli articoli ripubblicati su questo sito provengono da piattaforme pubbliche e sono forniti esclusivamente a scopo informativo. Non riflettono necessariamente le opinioni di MEXC. Tutti i diritti rimangono agli autori originali. Se ritieni che un contenuto violi i diritti di terze parti, contatta crypto.news@mexc.com per la rimozione. MEXC non fornisce alcuna garanzia in merito all'accuratezza, completezza o tempestività del contenuto e non è responsabile per eventuali azioni intraprese sulla base delle informazioni fornite. Il contenuto non costituisce consulenza finanziaria, legale o professionale di altro tipo, né deve essere considerato una raccomandazione o un'approvazione da parte di MEXC.

Potrebbe anche piacerti

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Condividi
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

Shalom Baranes, a Libyan refugee and chief architect for President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project, described the president’s immigration policies as
Condividi
Rawstory2026/03/22 00:47
Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Republican strategist Steve Schmidt says he’s been a Republican for nearly 30 years, long enough to see it’s sad “devolution” over the last few.“Yesterday, was
Condividi
Alternet2026/03/21 23:54