TLDR Berachain’s co-founder, Smokey the Bera, disputes claims about Nova Digital’s $25M refund clause in the Series B funding. The refund clause allows Nova Digital to reclaim its entire $25M investment until February 6, 2026. Legal experts call the refund clause unusual, as such mechanisms typically only trigger if a project fails to launch tokens. [...] The post Berachain Under Scrutiny Over Nova Digital’s $25M Refund Clause appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Berachain’s co-founder, Smokey the Bera, disputes claims about Nova Digital’s $25M refund clause in the Series B funding. The refund clause allows Nova Digital to reclaim its entire $25M investment until February 6, 2026. Legal experts call the refund clause unusual, as such mechanisms typically only trigger if a project fails to launch tokens. [...] The post Berachain Under Scrutiny Over Nova Digital’s $25M Refund Clause appeared first on CoinCentral.

Berachain Under Scrutiny Over Nova Digital’s $25M Refund Clause

2025/11/26 02:36
4 min di lettura
Per feedback o dubbi su questo contenuto, contattateci all'indirizzo crypto.news@mexc.com.

TLDR

  • Berachain’s co-founder, Smokey the Bera, disputes claims about Nova Digital’s $25M refund clause in the Series B funding.
  • The refund clause allows Nova Digital to reclaim its entire $25M investment until February 6, 2026.
  • Legal experts call the refund clause unusual, as such mechanisms typically only trigger if a project fails to launch tokens.
  • Some investors in Berachain’s Series B were unaware of the special terms granted to Nova Digital.
  • Framework Ventures holds significant losses on its Berachain investment, reflecting the project’s ongoing struggles.

Berachain, a layer-1 blockchain project, has drawn attention over a refund clause secured by lead investor Brevan Howard’s Nova Digital fund. The clause grants Nova a unique $25 million refund option on its Series B investment. Berachain’s anonymous co-founder, Smokey the Bera, dismissed claims that the arrangement was unusual, calling them inaccurate and incomplete.

Refund Clause Sparks Debate Over Funding Practices

The refund clause in question allows Nova Digital to reclaim its $25 million investment until February 6, 2026. This is one year after Berachain’s token generation event, which took place on February 6, 2025. According to documents obtained by Unchained, the clause was activated when Nova deposited $5 million into a Berachain wallet within 30 days of the token launch.

Legal experts in the crypto space have said that such refund mechanisms are highly unusual in token fundraises. “Refund rights typically only trigger if projects fail to launch tokens at all,” said Gabriel Shapiro, co-founder of MetaLeX Labs. He further explained that this clause differs from typical venture investments, where capital remains at risk regardless of performance.

Smokey the Bera defended the deal in a statement, arguing that Nova’s compliance team required provisions to cover specific scenarios. He claimed that Nova participated in the Series B fundraise using the same paperwork as all other investors. He also confirmed that Nova remains one of Berachain’s largest tokenholders despite the controversy surrounding the refund clause.

Investor Confusion and Potential MFN Violation

Two investors in Berachain’s Series B round told Unchained they were unaware of the refund clause granted to Nova Digital. They raised concerns that this deal might violate Most Favored Nation (MFN) provisions, which could guarantee early investors access to better terms. Aaron Brogan, founder of Brogan Law, indicated that the refund mechanism likely triggered MFN rights for other investors.

Despite the backlash, Smokey the Bera emphasized that no other Series B investors received MFN clauses. He dismissed the claims in the Unchained report, attributing them to disgruntled former employees. However, sources familiar with the matter suggested that Brevan Howard’s special terms could set a precedent for future token fundraising deals.

Framework Ventures, another investor in Berachain’s Series B, acquired 21,145,476 BERA tokens by the end of Q2 2025. These tokens were purchased at a cost of approximately $72.4 million. At the current price of $1.02 per token, Framework’s holdings reflect a paper loss of over $50.8 million.

Berachain Faces Operational Challenges

In 2025, Berachain experienced around $367 million in net outflows to competing blockchains, according to Artemis data. Despite these financial setbacks, the network has continued to operate, with recent issues arising from a Balancer protocol vulnerability. On November 3, 2025, validators paused the chain temporarily after the vulnerability put $12.8 million in funds at risk. The network was back online within 24 hours, and a white-hat hacker recovered assets.

In October 2025, Berachain announced a potential turnaround strategy with Greenlane Holdings. The smoking accessories company revealed a $110 million private placement to acquire BERA for its digital asset treasury. This move attracted backing from several notable firms, including Polychain, Blockchain.com, and Kraken.

Nova Digital is now being spun out from Brevan Howard due to differences in risk tolerance and strategy. Once the separation is complete, Brevan will have no further involvement with Berachain. This move marks a new chapter for both Berachain and Nova Digital, as they navigate the complexities of the blockchain space and investor relationships.

The post Berachain Under Scrutiny Over Nova Digital’s $25M Refund Clause appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: gli articoli ripubblicati su questo sito provengono da piattaforme pubbliche e sono forniti esclusivamente a scopo informativo. Non riflettono necessariamente le opinioni di MEXC. Tutti i diritti rimangono agli autori originali. Se ritieni che un contenuto violi i diritti di terze parti, contatta crypto.news@mexc.com per la rimozione. MEXC non fornisce alcuna garanzia in merito all'accuratezza, completezza o tempestività del contenuto e non è responsabile per eventuali azioni intraprese sulla base delle informazioni fornite. Il contenuto non costituisce consulenza finanziaria, legale o professionale di altro tipo, né deve essere considerato una raccomandazione o un'approvazione da parte di MEXC.

Potrebbe anche piacerti

XAG/USD struggles near $75.50 on firm hopes of Fed’s extended pause

XAG/USD struggles near $75.50 on firm hopes of Fed’s extended pause

The post XAG/USD struggles near $75.50 on firm hopes of Fed’s extended pause appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Silver price (XAG/USD) struggles to gain ground
Condividi
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/19 14:04
WLFI Price Drops 4% Despite New Governance Proposal

WLFI Price Drops 4% Despite New Governance Proposal

The post WLFI Price Drops 4% Despite New Governance Proposal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights World Liberty Financial (WLFI) price dropped by
Condividi
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/19 14:19
The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The post The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Researchers found $40 million in “risk-free” profits from mispriced markets on Polymarket in one year. Prices on some markets didn’t add up to 100%, letting traders lock in guaranteed gains. The same inefficiencies likely exist on other platforms like Myriad and Kalshi, though arbitrageurs help correct them. A new academic paper suggests there’s been a steady stream of “free money” lying around on Polymarket—and smart traders have been scooping it up. The paper, Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets, is the most detailed look yet at how mispricing creeps into crypto’s most popular prediction platform. The researchers combed through a year of data, from April 2024 to April 2025, and found thousands of instances where market prices simply didn’t add up. In some cases, the prices of “Yes” and “No” shares in a single market didn’t sum to one dollar as they theoretically should, creating a risk-free profit for anyone quick enough to pounce.  In other cases, the mispricing was more subtle, involving logically related markets. For example, a market on “Trump wins the presidency” might trade at very different odds than “Republican wins the presidency,” even though those outcomes are tightly linked. By buying and selling combinations of these contracts, a savvy trader could lock in a profit no matter what happens. The researchers estimate more than $40 million in profits have already been pulled from the system by arbitrageurs, traders who specialize in sniffing out and exploiting these kinds of inconsistencies. Far from being a theoretical curiosity, this is a live and lucrative business model. Is this pattern true across all prediction markets? What’s striking is how common these opportunities are. The study found more than 7,000 markets with measurable mispricing, many in highly liquid, closely watched contracts. “Prediction markets are often treated…
Condividi
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:34