Persistent, programmatic selling across major crypto assets has sparked fresh speculation that the market is still digesting cascading liquidations from October 10 — and that at least one large player is being unwound in the background. On November 19, Multicoin Capital co-founder Tushar Jain wrote on X that “it feels like a big forced seller […]Persistent, programmatic selling across major crypto assets has sparked fresh speculation that the market is still digesting cascading liquidations from October 10 — and that at least one large player is being unwound in the background. On November 19, Multicoin Capital co-founder Tushar Jain wrote on X that “it feels like a big forced seller […]

Systematic Crypto Dump? Multicoin Co-Founder Smells A Massive ‘Forced Seller’

2025/11/21 08:00
4 min di lettura
Per feedback o dubbi su questo contenuto, contattateci all'indirizzo crypto.news@mexc.com.

Persistent, programmatic selling across major crypto assets has sparked fresh speculation that the market is still digesting cascading liquidations from October 10 — and that at least one large player is being unwound in the background.

On November 19, Multicoin Capital co-founder Tushar Jain wrote on X that “it feels like a big forced seller is in the market,” adding that “we are seeing systematic selling during specific hours.” He linked the pattern directly to the October 10 liquidation shock, calling it “probably a consequence of 10/10 liquidations” and concluding: “Hard to imagine this scale of forced selling continues for much longer.”

Jain has framed the current tape through the lens of his experience in 2022. On October 11, one day after the 10/10 flush, he warned that “it takes some time for all the bankruptcies to reveal themselves after a big liquidation flush like this.” According to him, in such episodes “big trading shops are running around trying to figure out what their exposure to insolvent counterparties is and that takes time.” When asked how long this process can last, he answered that “sometimes it takes weeks. Sometimes it takes months. It depends on what people do to try and patch the holes.”

That delayed discovery of losses is central to the emerging “forced seller” narrative. Rather than a single cathartic event, the 10/10 wipeout is being treated by professionals as the starting point of a longer adjustment, where risk is reduced gradually as lenders, counterparties and risk desks work through opaque exposures.

Systematic Sell Pressure Points To Forced Crypto Seller

Other market participants are publicly describing a similar pattern. LondonCryptoClub wrote that it “increasingly feels like someone out there being forced to liquidate a portfolio,” highlighting the “constant mechanical nature of the selling (in US hours).” Drawing on their foreign-exchange background, they compared this to periods in FX where unexplained flows later turned out to be related to large corporate or M&A-driven mandates, summarizing the current environment as a “flow driven market” and concluding: “A dead body will probably float to the surface soon.”

ETF analyst James Seyffart responded to Jain’s post by asking whether anyone had “any theories or guesses on who it could be if this were true,” underscoring that there is, so far, no credible public attribution.

Rumors about structural damage surfaced almost immediately after the October event. On October 12, The Rollup Co founder Andy Klages wrote that the “rumor mill [is] currently saying two large trading firms were liquidated to zero,” describing a setup where they allegedly “owned a book of top 100 mcap tokens which were collateralized against each other in size ($1B+) & became forced market sellers of their entire book.”

Related Reading: Hyperliquid At Risk In Democrats’ Crypto Crackdown? ZachXBT Warns Of Potential Risks

No firm fitting that description has publicly confirmed such a loss, but the structure Klages outlines matches what many professionals see as a key fragility: cross-collateralized altcoin books used as funding and margin.

Fundstrat’s and Bitmine’s Tom Lee independently argued on November 15 that the price action “has all the signs of a market maker (or two) with a major ‘hole’ in their balance sheet,” describing “sharks circling to trigger a liquidation / dumping of prices BTC.” He characterized the resulting pain as short-term and explicitly stated that it “does not” change his view on “the ETH supercycle of Wall Street building on blockchain.”

For now, there is no “dead body” on the surface: no major market maker or trading shop has publicly disclosed insolvency linked to October 10, and the identity of any alleged forced seller remains unknown.

But the consistency of the reports — systematic US-hours sell programs, rumors of cross-collateralized books blown out, and references to hidden balance-sheet holes — suggests that, weeks after the 10/10 shock, crypto markets may still be trading under the weight of positions that are being unwound because they have to be, not because anyone wants them to be.

At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $3.1 trillion.

Total crypto market cap
Opportunità di mercato
Logo Major
Valore Major (MAJOR)
$0.06074
$0.06074$0.06074
+1.30%
USD
Grafico dei prezzi in tempo reale di Major (MAJOR)
Disclaimer: gli articoli ripubblicati su questo sito provengono da piattaforme pubbliche e sono forniti esclusivamente a scopo informativo. Non riflettono necessariamente le opinioni di MEXC. Tutti i diritti rimangono agli autori originali. Se ritieni che un contenuto violi i diritti di terze parti, contatta crypto.news@mexc.com per la rimozione. MEXC non fornisce alcuna garanzia in merito all'accuratezza, completezza o tempestività del contenuto e non è responsabile per eventuali azioni intraprese sulla base delle informazioni fornite. Il contenuto non costituisce consulenza finanziaria, legale o professionale di altro tipo, né deve essere considerato una raccomandazione o un'approvazione da parte di MEXC.

Potrebbe anche piacerti

What Pacers Must Consider In Extensions For Bennedict Mathurin Or Aaron Nesmith

What Pacers Must Consider In Extensions For Bennedict Mathurin Or Aaron Nesmith

The post What Pacers Must Consider In Extensions For Bennedict Mathurin Or Aaron Nesmith appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. PORTLAND, OREGON – JANUARY 19: Bennedict Mathurin #00 of the Indiana Pacers and Aaron Nesmith #23 box out Duop Reath #26 of the Portland Trail Blazers during the fourth quarter of the game at the Moda Center on January 19, 2024 in Portland, Oregon. The Portland Trail Blazers won 118-115. (Photo by Alika Jenner/Getty Images) Getty Images INDIANAPOLIS – While the Indiana Pacers free agency period has slowed significantly – all they have done since their July 24 two-way agreement with Taelon Peter is sign Jalen Slawson to an Exhibit 10 deal – they still have two contract negotiations to consider before the season starts. Guard Bennedict Mathurin as well as wing Aaron Nesmith are both eligible for a contract extension this offseason, and they both have drastically different considerations guiding financial dialogue with the team. Mathurin is eligible for a rookie-scale extension until October 20. Nesmith, meanwhile, could sign a veteran extension this offseason, and his agreement has the same deadline. Once the regular season arrives, both players won’t be able to sign any new deals until next summer. There is a time restriction. Both Nesmith and Mathurin are talented and relatively young. In theory, that’s the type of player a team would want to keep – but things are never that simple. The Pacers are currently under the luxury tax and project to be about $20-26 shy of that threshold next season, then $70-79 below it in 2027-28 – the year Nesmith’s extension would kick in. A lot can change for a team’s roster and salary outlook, so those numbers may not end up being relevant. But that flexibility is a part of the story when it comes to the Pacers extension negotiations with both players – and the salary chatter for both projects to be different. “Yeah,…
Condividi
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:56
Which Chinese network cable suppliers with international certifications are suitable for overseas enterprise projects?

Which Chinese network cable suppliers with international certifications are suitable for overseas enterprise projects?

Discover the top network cable manufacturers in China supplying certified Cat5e, Cat6, and Cat6a Ethernet cables for global enterprise networks, telecom infrastructure
Condividi
Techbullion2026/03/06 19:27
Qatar’s Energy Minister Warns Of Potential $150 Per Barrel Surge

Qatar’s Energy Minister Warns Of Potential $150 Per Barrel Surge

The post Qatar’s Energy Minister Warns Of Potential $150 Per Barrel Surge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Oil Price Forecast: Qatar’s Energy Minister Warns
Condividi
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/06 19:29