PANews reported on September 18th that, according to Aiyi's monitoring, an address that had reopened its ETH holdings after two years appears to have liquidated its holdings. The address purchased 8,711.3 ETH (approximately $33.76 million) at an average price of $3,876 between July 28th and September 14th, ultimately selling them in two installments, the most recent of which was a 5,000 ETH deposit two hours ago. If all of the holdings were sold, the cumulative profit would be $5.23 million, a 15.5% return on holdings in less than three months.PANews reported on September 18th that, according to Aiyi's monitoring, an address that had reopened its ETH holdings after two years appears to have liquidated its holdings. The address purchased 8,711.3 ETH (approximately $33.76 million) at an average price of $3,876 between July 28th and September 14th, ultimately selling them in two installments, the most recent of which was a 5,000 ETH deposit two hours ago. If all of the holdings were sold, the cumulative profit would be $5.23 million, a 15.5% return on holdings in less than three months.
The address that re-established ETH after two years is suspected to have liquidated its position, making a profit of $5.23 million in three months
Per feedback o dubbi su questo contenuto, contattateci all'indirizzo crypto.news@mexc.com.
PANews reported on September 18th that, according to Aiyi's monitoring, an address that had reopened its ETH holdings after two years appears to have liquidated its holdings. The address purchased 8,711.3 ETH (approximately $33.76 million) at an average price of $3,876 between July 28th and September 14th, ultimately selling them in two installments, the most recent of which was a 5,000 ETH deposit two hours ago. If all of the holdings were sold, the cumulative profit would be $5.23 million, a 15.5% return on holdings in less than three months.
Disclaimer: gli articoli ripubblicati su questo sito provengono da piattaforme pubbliche e sono forniti esclusivamente a scopo informativo. Non riflettono necessariamente le opinioni di MEXC. Tutti i diritti rimangono agli autori originali. Se ritieni che un contenuto violi i diritti di terze parti, contatta crypto.news@mexc.com per la rimozione. MEXC non fornisce alcuna garanzia in merito all'accuratezza, completezza o tempestività del contenuto e non è responsabile per eventuali azioni intraprese sulla base delle informazioni fornite. Il contenuto non costituisce consulenza finanziaria, legale o professionale di altro tipo, né deve essere considerato una raccomandazione o un'approvazione da parte di MEXC.
Potrebbe anche piacerti
Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny
The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Condividi
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
The most popular open-source project in history almost became a "trophy" in the cryptocurrency world.
Author: Nancy, PANews A dark horse has emerged in the open-source world. In just three months, OpenClaw has become the most popular and fastest-growing open-source
Condividi
PANews2026/03/04 11:48
Japanese Yen Soars: Safe-Haven Surge to 157.50 as Middle East Tensions Escalate
BitcoinWorld Japanese Yen Soars: Safe-Haven Surge to 157.50 as Middle East Tensions Escalate TOKYO, April 2025 – The Japanese Yen has surged dramatically, strengthening
Condividi
bitcoinworld2026/03/04 12:15