The post Ripple May Be Forced to Sell 25% of XRP—Who Will Buy? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP trades around $2.04 and remains under pressure after weeks of volatile sentiment, marking a drop of 7.5% in the last 7 days and 9% in the last 30 days. The token dropped through parts of the last month, yet the network prepares for a technical shift that may shape long-term adoption. Smart Escrows now enter the ecosystem, and the upgrade unlocks programmable conditions inside the XRP Ledger’s native escrow system. Vet, a well-known XRPL validator, shared the development on X. His update revealed a major step that turns basic escrows into programmable tools. The feature introduces on-ledger logic that evaluates preset conditions before funds move. This logic gives users a simple form of automation without a heavy smart-contract layer. The Smart Escrow model stores a compact program inside each escrow object. The program checks conditions in real time and decides whether funds should release or return. Users no longer rely on outside systems to manage those conditions. XRPL keeps its fast settlement design while gaining expressive power. How the New Conditional Logic Works The embedded logic checks on-chain data or oracle feeds during each evaluation. The process stays lightweight so the ledger maintains speed. Developers can automate basic agreements without building external apps or custom verification layers. The design fits XRPL’s performance standards. Smart Escrows run programs that verify rules with minimal friction. A business can enforce milestones. A lender can trigger collateral release. A user can lock XRP until market prices meet the target. Each flow executes through rules set at creation. Oracle Inputs Shape Real-World Use Cases Oracles supply data such as exchange rates, delivery confirmations, or compliance checks. Smart Escrows use those inputs to determine outcomes. A price-based escrow triggers settlement when XRP hits the target. A vendor contract completes payment after an oracle confirms delivery.… The post Ripple May Be Forced to Sell 25% of XRP—Who Will Buy? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP trades around $2.04 and remains under pressure after weeks of volatile sentiment, marking a drop of 7.5% in the last 7 days and 9% in the last 30 days. The token dropped through parts of the last month, yet the network prepares for a technical shift that may shape long-term adoption. Smart Escrows now enter the ecosystem, and the upgrade unlocks programmable conditions inside the XRP Ledger’s native escrow system. Vet, a well-known XRPL validator, shared the development on X. His update revealed a major step that turns basic escrows into programmable tools. The feature introduces on-ledger logic that evaluates preset conditions before funds move. This logic gives users a simple form of automation without a heavy smart-contract layer. The Smart Escrow model stores a compact program inside each escrow object. The program checks conditions in real time and decides whether funds should release or return. Users no longer rely on outside systems to manage those conditions. XRPL keeps its fast settlement design while gaining expressive power. How the New Conditional Logic Works The embedded logic checks on-chain data or oracle feeds during each evaluation. The process stays lightweight so the ledger maintains speed. Developers can automate basic agreements without building external apps or custom verification layers. The design fits XRPL’s performance standards. Smart Escrows run programs that verify rules with minimal friction. A business can enforce milestones. A lender can trigger collateral release. A user can lock XRP until market prices meet the target. Each flow executes through rules set at creation. Oracle Inputs Shape Real-World Use Cases Oracles supply data such as exchange rates, delivery confirmations, or compliance checks. Smart Escrows use those inputs to determine outcomes. A price-based escrow triggers settlement when XRP hits the target. A vendor contract completes payment after an oracle confirms delivery.…

Ripple May Be Forced to Sell 25% of XRP—Who Will Buy?

2025/12/07 03:44

XRP trades around $2.04 and remains under pressure after weeks of volatile sentiment, marking a drop of 7.5% in the last 7 days and 9% in the last 30 days. The token dropped through parts of the last month, yet the network prepares for a technical shift that may shape long-term adoption. Smart Escrows now enter the ecosystem, and the upgrade unlocks programmable conditions inside the XRP Ledger’s native escrow system.

Vet, a well-known XRPL validator, shared the development on X. His update revealed a major step that turns basic escrows into programmable tools. The feature introduces on-ledger logic that evaluates preset conditions before funds move. This logic gives users a simple form of automation without a heavy smart-contract layer.

The Smart Escrow model stores a compact program inside each escrow object. The program checks conditions in real time and decides whether funds should release or return. Users no longer rely on outside systems to manage those conditions. XRPL keeps its fast settlement design while gaining expressive power.

How the New Conditional Logic Works

The embedded logic checks on-chain data or oracle feeds during each evaluation. The process stays lightweight so the ledger maintains speed. Developers can automate basic agreements without building external apps or custom verification layers.

The design fits XRPL’s performance standards. Smart Escrows run programs that verify rules with minimal friction. A business can enforce milestones. A lender can trigger collateral release. A user can lock XRP until market prices meet the target. Each flow executes through rules set at creation.

Oracle Inputs Shape Real-World Use Cases

Oracles supply data such as exchange rates, delivery confirmations, or compliance checks. Smart Escrows use those inputs to determine outcomes. A price-based escrow triggers settlement when XRP hits the target. A vendor contract completes payment after an oracle confirms delivery. Institutions can create structured settlement paths across borders without custom code.

This upgrade offers new confidence for firms that rely on predictable execution. The XRPL community tests the amendment as validators move toward activation. Each validator prepares to run updated software so the feature launches cleanly.

Why Smart Escrows Matter for the XRPL Ecosystem

Smart Escrows strengthen automation without slowing the ledger. Users gain transparency because the conditions sit on-chain. Developers gain new flexibility. Institutions gain predictable behavior that fits regulated environments.

The feature expands XRPL’s reach in digital finance. It delivers logic that improves settlement, lending, vendor payments, and price-triggered flows. The XRPL moves from a simple escrow model to programmable conditional settlement.

Ripple Faces New Questions on Its Escrowed XRP

The conversation around Ripple’s escrowed holdings grows louder. Crypto Sensei sparked fresh debate when he described how Ripple can structure sales around escrowed XRP without releasing tokens into circulation. He noted that Ripple can sell rights to future escrow releases or even sell the destination accounts tied to those escrows. He stressed that such moves do not put XRP into the market until the escrow completes.

His comments challenged rumors that Ripple already sold large quantities to institutions. He argued that most claims lack proof because Ripple relocks about 700 million XRP each month. Those tokens would not return to escrow if Ripple no longer held control.

The Clarity Act Raises the Stakes

Crypto Sensei highlighted the Clarity Act, a proposed bill that limits any single company from holding more than 20% of a blockchain’s supply. Ripple controls about 45 billion XRP, equal to roughly 45% of the supply. If the bill becomes law, Ripple may need to reduce its holdings to around 20 billion XRP.

He outlined possible actions. Ripple may reveal who controls certain escrow accounts. It may create a clear plan to reduce its 45 billion XRP position. These steps matter because supply transparency shapes investor confidence.

What This Means for XRP’s Outlook

XRP’s long-term trajectory depends on how Ripple manages future supply. Market participants monitor its escrow flows and institutional relationships. If Ripple sells rights tied to escrowed tokens, the buyer profile may influence market expectations.

Smart Escrows expand XRPL’s technical capabilities at the same moment Ripple faces new regulatory pressure. Both developments shape the next chapter for XRP. The network grows stronger while Ripple calculates how its holdings fit into a changing regulatory landscape.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/12917/ripple-might-be-forced-to-dump-25-of-xrp-who-are-the-buyers-and-why

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40