BitcoinWorld Critical Bitcoin Bear Market Signal: 100-1,000 BTC Wallet Buying Slows Dramatically Is a major shift in Bitcoin’s market structure underway? A crucial on-chain metric is flashing a warning sign that seasoned investors watch closely. According to a recent analysis by CryptoQuant’s Julio Moreno, buying pressure from a key investor cohort—addresses holding between 100 and 1,000 BTC—has slowed significantly. This slowdown has broken a long-term upward trendline, […] This post Critical Bitcoin Bear Market Signal: 100-1,000 BTC Wallet Buying Slows Dramatically first appeared on BitcoinWorld.BitcoinWorld Critical Bitcoin Bear Market Signal: 100-1,000 BTC Wallet Buying Slows Dramatically Is a major shift in Bitcoin’s market structure underway? A crucial on-chain metric is flashing a warning sign that seasoned investors watch closely. According to a recent analysis by CryptoQuant’s Julio Moreno, buying pressure from a key investor cohort—addresses holding between 100 and 1,000 BTC—has slowed significantly. This slowdown has broken a long-term upward trendline, […] This post Critical Bitcoin Bear Market Signal: 100-1,000 BTC Wallet Buying Slows Dramatically first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Critical Bitcoin Bear Market Signal: 100-1,000 BTC Wallet Buying Slows Dramatically

2025/12/06 07:25
A cartoon Bitcoin bear market signal showing large investors reducing purchases on a downward chart.

BitcoinWorld

Critical Bitcoin Bear Market Signal: 100-1,000 BTC Wallet Buying Slows Dramatically

Is a major shift in Bitcoin’s market structure underway? A crucial on-chain metric is flashing a warning sign that seasoned investors watch closely. According to a recent analysis by CryptoQuant’s Julio Moreno, buying pressure from a key investor cohort—addresses holding between 100 and 1,000 BTC—has slowed significantly. This slowdown has broken a long-term upward trendline, suggesting a pivotal change in market dynamics. For anyone tracking the Bitcoin bear market potential, this data point is impossible to ignore.

What Does the 100-1,000 BTC Wallet Data Reveal?

Julio Moreno, a senior analyst at the on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant, has pinpointed a concerning trend. The cohort of wallets holding between 100 and 1,000 BTC, which importantly includes addresses for Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) and corporate treasuries, is showing weakened demand. Their cumulative annual purchases have fallen sharply.

  • Peak Purchase: 965,000 BTC at the all-time high.
  • Current Purchase Level: 694,000 BTC.

This represents a substantial drop. Moreno concludes that this decline in demand from such a significant player group is a strong indicator that the market may have entered a bear market phase. This isn’t just retail sentiment; it’s a signal from some of the market’s largest and most informed entities.

Why is This Investor Cohort So Important?

You might wonder why this specific group matters more than others. The answer lies in their profile and influence. Addresses in the 100-1,000 BTC range are typically not held by everyday retail investors. Instead, they represent:

  • Institutional Capital: This includes Bitcoin ETF holdings and corporate treasury allocations (like those from MicroStrategy or Tesla).
  • Sophisticated Whales: High-net-worth individuals or investment funds with a deep understanding of market cycles.
  • Market Stability: Their consistent buying has historically provided a foundation of support during corrections.

When these deep-pocketed investors slow their accumulation, it removes a major source of buy-side pressure. This can leave the market more vulnerable to downward moves, reinforcing the Bitcoin bear market thesis.

How Does This Signal a Potential Bitcoin Bear Market?

The technical breakdown of the long-term trendline is the critical chart pattern. Think of this trendline as a measure of consistent institutional faith. For months or even years, this group’s buying activity formed a reliable upward slope on the chart. The recent break below this line is a technical confirmation of the weakening fundamental data.

Therefore, it’s not just that purchases are down. The pattern of support has been violated. This combination of factors—reduced buying volume from key players and a broken technical structure—creates a compelling argument for a shift in the market cycle. It suggests a period of consolidation or decline, a hallmark of a bear market, may be taking hold.

What Should Investors Do With This Information?

This analysis serves as a crucial data point, not a crystal ball. However, it provides actionable context for your strategy. First, understand that on-chain analytics like this offer a view into the actions of major holders, which often precede price movements. Second, this signal suggests increasing caution may be prudent.

Consider reviewing your portfolio’s risk exposure and ensuring you have a plan for different market scenarios. Remember, a Bitcoin bear market phase, while challenging, also creates opportunities for long-term accumulation at lower price points for those who are prepared.

Conclusion: A Vital Metric Demands Attention

The slowdown in buying from 100-1,000 BTC wallets is a stark warning from the blockchain itself. When the market’s most substantial and presumably well-informed participants pull back, it’s a trend that demands respect. While no single indicator guarantees the future, this breakdown in institutional accumulation pressure is a powerful piece of evidence supporting the bear market entry thesis. Investors should monitor this and other on-chain metrics closely to navigate the potentially shifting tides ahead.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: Does this signal guarantee a Bitcoin price crash?
A: No single metric guarantees future price action. This is a strong warning sign of weakening demand from a critical cohort, but it must be considered alongside other market factors like macroeconomic conditions and broader adoption trends.

Q2: Who is Julio Moreno and why should I trust this analysis?
A: Julio Moreno is a Senior Analyst at CryptoQuant, a leading provider of on-chain data and analytics for cryptocurrencies. His analysis is based on transparent, verifiable blockchain data rather than opinion.

Q3: What other signs should I look for in a bear market?
A: Other signs include sustained price trading below key moving averages (like the 200-day), negative funding rates in perpetual futures markets, and a general decline in market sentiment and trading volume.

Q4: Can a bear market be a good thing for investors?
A: For long-term, disciplined investors, bear markets can present opportunities to accumulate assets at lower prices, a strategy often referred to as “dollar-cost averaging.” However, it requires a strong stomach for volatility.

Q5: How long do Bitcoin bear markets typically last?
A: Historically, Bitcoin bear markets have varied in length, often lasting several months to over a year. They are part of the natural market cycle.

Q6: Do ETF flows still affect this wallet cohort?
A> Yes, significantly. A large portion of the BTC in this 100-1,000 range is held by custodians for spot Bitcoin ETFs. Slowing purchases by this cohort directly reflects slowing net inflows into these ETFs.

Found this analysis of key Bitcoin bear market signals insightful? Help other investors stay informed by sharing this article on X (Twitter), LinkedIn, or your favorite crypto forum. Knowledge is power, especially in volatile markets!

To learn more about the latest Bitcoin trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin institutional adoption.

This post Critical Bitcoin Bear Market Signal: 100-1,000 BTC Wallet Buying Slows Dramatically first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31
Michigan moves ahead with strategic crypto reserve bill

Michigan moves ahead with strategic crypto reserve bill

The post Michigan moves ahead with strategic crypto reserve bill appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michigan lawmakers are advancing a proposal that would allow the state to establish a strategic crypto reserve, as the Midwestern state joins other US jurisdictions considering digital assets for public investment.  The proposed legislation, known as House Bill 4087, moved to a second reading on Thursday and was referred to the Committee on Government Operations. It was introduced in February by Republican Representatives Bryan Posthumus and Ron Robinson, who are asking the House to amend the Michigan Management and Budget Act.  “Michigan can and should join Texas in leading on crypto policy by signing into law my bill creating the Michigan Crypto Strategic Reserve,” Posthumus wrote on X at the time of its introduction. If passed, the state treasurer’s authority will be allowed to allocate up to 10% of funds from Michigan’s countercyclical budget and economic stabilization fund into crypto. Michigan government could become crypto holders House Bill 4087 allows the state to maintain its digital assets in three possible ways: through a secure custody solution, through a qualified custodian such as a bank, trust company, or state-regulated firm, or by acquiring exchange-traded products (ETPs) from registered investment companies. House Bill 4086 and 4087. Source: Michigan legislation website. Security procedures for the crypto holdings include exclusive government control over private keys, end-to-end encryption of all data, and the prohibition of access via smartphones.  Michigan-owned digital assets’ information will be stored in secure data centers in different locations within the state. At the same time, transactions would require multiparty authorization, in addition to regular independent security audits. The bill allows the state to loan out crypto to generate additional revenue, provided that such activity does not increase exposure to financial risk.  House Bill 4086, which was also introduced during the same month by Representatives Alabas Farhat, Ron Robinson, and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 17:49