TLDR: Polymarket’s new market-making desk faces criticism over shifting core values. Polymarket risks alienating users with its new in-house pricing model. Is Polymarket’s move to a sportsbook model a revenue strategy or a risk? Experts warn of reputational and legal challenges for Polymarket’s new desk. Polymarket’s shift to internal market-making could reshape its identity. Polymarket [...] The post Polymarket Moves Toward In-House Trading Desk, Raising Questions appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR: Polymarket’s new market-making desk faces criticism over shifting core values. Polymarket risks alienating users with its new in-house pricing model. Is Polymarket’s move to a sportsbook model a revenue strategy or a risk? Experts warn of reputational and legal challenges for Polymarket’s new desk. Polymarket’s shift to internal market-making could reshape its identity. Polymarket [...] The post Polymarket Moves Toward In-House Trading Desk, Raising Questions appeared first on CoinCentral.

Polymarket Moves Toward In-House Trading Desk, Raising Questions

2025/12/06 05:04

TLDR:

  • Polymarket’s new market-making desk faces criticism over shifting core values.
  • Polymarket risks alienating users with its new in-house pricing model.
  • Is Polymarket’s move to a sportsbook model a revenue strategy or a risk?
  • Experts warn of reputational and legal challenges for Polymarket’s new desk.
  • Polymarket’s shift to internal market-making could reshape its identity.

Polymarket has announced plans to establish an internal market-making team that would trade directly against its users. The initiative comes as part of the platform’s efforts to expand its operations in the United States, following the resolution of regulatory concerns from a 2022 case. The new desk would mirror a sportsbook model, where Polymarket sets prices and absorbs risks instead of relying on user-driven liquidity.

Polymarket’s Strategy: Revenue Over Product Improvement

The decision to introduce an internal trading desk marks a significant shift for Polymarket, traditionally known for its user-driven prediction markets. The company has approached traders and sports bettors about joining the new team, which would price and match bets through a Request for Quote (RFQ) protocol. Industry observers have raised concerns about the company’s motivation, noting that Polymarket’s primary goal seems to be generating revenue rather than improving the platform’s product offerings.

Experts like Harry Crane, a statistics professor at Rutgers University, believe that while the trading desk could offer a new revenue stream, it also brings significant reputational and legal risks. Crane argues that a profitable desk could create PR issues and legal exposure, similar to the challenges faced by Kalshi, another prediction market platform with a similar model. Critics contend that Polymarket risks alienating its core audience, who value the platform’s neutrality and the market-driven nature of its pricing.

A Move That Could Reshape Polymarket’s Identity

Polymarket’s foray into the sportsbook model could redefine its identity and cause friction with users who joined the platform for its unique prediction market experience. In a sportsbook, the house sets prices, often embedding a margin to guarantee profit. This shift raises questions about Polymarket’s commitment to providing an unbiased platform where prices reflect collective expectations rather than a single entity’s interests.

The new structure could blur the line between a prediction market and a traditional sportsbook, undermining Polymarket’s core value proposition. Users may begin to question whether the odds on the platform reflect genuine market sentiment or if they are influenced by the internal desk’s pricing decisions. The company’s reputation as a reliable source of real-world probabilities could be at risk, particularly after its role in the 2024 U.S. election cycle when it was widely cited by news outlets alongside polling data.

The post Polymarket Moves Toward In-House Trading Desk, Raising Questions appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

the $63M White Whale of a tale

the $63M White Whale of a tale

The post the $63M White Whale of a tale appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This weekend on crypto social media, memecoin traders spun yet another fantastic tale of leveraged trading meltdown.  According to the still-being-written legend, crypto exchange MEXC locked $3 million belonging to famed crypto trader The White Whale. As he continued to amass money from leveraged trading despite the freeze, he claimed that he’d become so wealthy that if MEXC ever unfroze the funds, he’d give away the proceeds to the community.  Then, on October 10, HyperLiquid liquidated $63 million of his then-larger assets amid a contentious pricing print from a data oracle. Though briefly devastated, MEXC eventually agreed to unlock his assets, prompting celebrations over his legendary return and, predictably, the creation of various memecoins. Smelling an opportunity, The White Whale decided to use some of his recently unlocked $3 million, earmarked for “the community,” to overtake one of these eponymous memecoins and add liquidity on its trading pairs. The White Whale of crypto Most crypto traders simply laughed as he attached cringe-worthy images of a white whale engaged in financial transactions to his trading commentary tweets. The laughter was appropriate, given how impossible it is to verify his narrative. So-called decentralized exchanges with limited know your customer requirements like HyperLiquid allow anyone to create an unlimited number of wallets and manipulate the pricing of markets across various wallets that they control.  In other words, no one except the trader knows if someone has sole claim to a single wallet and username, or whether someone is using multiple wallets in order to craft a trading history for one of many usernames. The White Whale, like the titular whale in Herman Melville’s 1851 novel, Moby Dick, has become an obsession to many on social media, thanks to the fantastic sums of money at stake, the clownish images, and the ostensibly philanthropic, Phoneix…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 21:19