Polygon co-founder and CEO Sandeep Nailwal suggested on Wednesday to his followers whether the network should revert to its original ticker, MATIC. He said he was curious what the broader community thinks about the initiative. Nailwal noted that the issue continues to surface in the Polygon trading community. He said that the community thinks MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker. The network’s co-founder also acknowledged that the ticker had history, recognition, and was stuck in people’s minds. Nailwal sees zero chance that exchanges will agree to the revert Thought Experiment: Time and again, I keep hearing from folks in the Polygon trading community that MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker — it had history, recognition, and stuck in people’s minds. So here’s an honest question: should we ask exchanges to revert just… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) November 25, 2025 Nailwal told the Polygon community that reverting the ticker to MATIC on exchanges is too much churn. He maintained that the network has already migrated to POL and should stick to it.  The firm’s CEO argued that a sufficient number of people are familiar with the POL ticker, especially in the X community. He revealed that the argument he keeps getting is that local businesses, which were aware of MATIC, wonder where the digital asset went. “The counter-argument I keep getting is: the guy in the Philippines running a sari-sari store, or an Uber driver in Dubai, knew MATIC… and now he has no idea where it went.” –Sandeep Nailwal, Co-Founder and CEO of Polygon. Nailwal added that another debate he encounters is that projects shouldn’t be basing their decisions on what the X community thinks. He argued that Crypto Twitter represents less than 5% of the total crypto trading population. Polygon’s CEO also disclosed that the recurring feedback from the community made him curious about what the broader community thinks about a revert. He believes that there are zero guarantees that exchanges will agree to the initiative, but still hinted that it might be a significant upgrade on their end. Crypto officials ponder the revert Abhinav Mehta, head of partnerships at Mansa Finance, argued that the revert is unnecessary, saying that change doesn’t happen overnight. He urged Nailwal not to double-think the decision.  Mehta said there’s no point in calling Polygon a chain that went from one name to another just because others didn’t hear about it and ended up changing it back to the original. One member of the Polygon community believes the network should do more to promote POL, including more brand deals to boost mainstream adoption. President of Open Campus, Mo Ezeldin, said the early adopters and supporters of Polygon recognized the token as MATIC. He also noted that there hasn’t been a new wave of retail entrants into the POL ecosystem. Ezeldin believes that going back to the original ticker might actually be the play for the network. Abdul Rafay Gadit, co-founder of ZIG Chain, acknowledged that MATIC had a different vibe to it. He also argued that reverting the ticker wouldn’t solve the network’s core problem. He said the old chart has already reset, and it won’t come back. Peter Kim, a marketer at Coinbase, suggested that Nailwal should focus on marketing POL better. He urged Polygon to start by putting the POL ticker name in official Polygon X accounts. He also believes that relisting POL on Robinhood might go a long way in its recognition. Polygon upgraded its PoS to POL in September 2024 as the native staking token. A year later, the network announced that the upgrade to MATIC had successfully reached 99%.  The firm maintained that the Polygon Portal interface still offers a 1:1 migration for users still holding MATIC. Polygon revealed that the upgrade provided more utility to the network’s cross-chain ecosystem interoperability solution, Agglayer.  Polygon also disclosed that the network’s PoS will soon integrate with Agglayer. The firm stated that the initiative aims to bring POL into the broader aggregated network. At the time of publication, POL is trading at $0.1367, up by roughly 1% in the last 24 hours. POL has also plummeted more than 2.61% in the past 7 days and nearly 33% in the past 30 days. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.Polygon co-founder and CEO Sandeep Nailwal suggested on Wednesday to his followers whether the network should revert to its original ticker, MATIC. He said he was curious what the broader community thinks about the initiative. Nailwal noted that the issue continues to surface in the Polygon trading community. He said that the community thinks MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker. The network’s co-founder also acknowledged that the ticker had history, recognition, and was stuck in people’s minds. Nailwal sees zero chance that exchanges will agree to the revert Thought Experiment: Time and again, I keep hearing from folks in the Polygon trading community that MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker — it had history, recognition, and stuck in people’s minds. So here’s an honest question: should we ask exchanges to revert just… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) November 25, 2025 Nailwal told the Polygon community that reverting the ticker to MATIC on exchanges is too much churn. He maintained that the network has already migrated to POL and should stick to it.  The firm’s CEO argued that a sufficient number of people are familiar with the POL ticker, especially in the X community. He revealed that the argument he keeps getting is that local businesses, which were aware of MATIC, wonder where the digital asset went. “The counter-argument I keep getting is: the guy in the Philippines running a sari-sari store, or an Uber driver in Dubai, knew MATIC… and now he has no idea where it went.” –Sandeep Nailwal, Co-Founder and CEO of Polygon. Nailwal added that another debate he encounters is that projects shouldn’t be basing their decisions on what the X community thinks. He argued that Crypto Twitter represents less than 5% of the total crypto trading population. Polygon’s CEO also disclosed that the recurring feedback from the community made him curious about what the broader community thinks about a revert. He believes that there are zero guarantees that exchanges will agree to the initiative, but still hinted that it might be a significant upgrade on their end. Crypto officials ponder the revert Abhinav Mehta, head of partnerships at Mansa Finance, argued that the revert is unnecessary, saying that change doesn’t happen overnight. He urged Nailwal not to double-think the decision.  Mehta said there’s no point in calling Polygon a chain that went from one name to another just because others didn’t hear about it and ended up changing it back to the original. One member of the Polygon community believes the network should do more to promote POL, including more brand deals to boost mainstream adoption. President of Open Campus, Mo Ezeldin, said the early adopters and supporters of Polygon recognized the token as MATIC. He also noted that there hasn’t been a new wave of retail entrants into the POL ecosystem. Ezeldin believes that going back to the original ticker might actually be the play for the network. Abdul Rafay Gadit, co-founder of ZIG Chain, acknowledged that MATIC had a different vibe to it. He also argued that reverting the ticker wouldn’t solve the network’s core problem. He said the old chart has already reset, and it won’t come back. Peter Kim, a marketer at Coinbase, suggested that Nailwal should focus on marketing POL better. He urged Polygon to start by putting the POL ticker name in official Polygon X accounts. He also believes that relisting POL on Robinhood might go a long way in its recognition. Polygon upgraded its PoS to POL in September 2024 as the native staking token. A year later, the network announced that the upgrade to MATIC had successfully reached 99%.  The firm maintained that the Polygon Portal interface still offers a 1:1 migration for users still holding MATIC. Polygon revealed that the upgrade provided more utility to the network’s cross-chain ecosystem interoperability solution, Agglayer.  Polygon also disclosed that the network’s PoS will soon integrate with Agglayer. The firm stated that the initiative aims to bring POL into the broader aggregated network. At the time of publication, POL is trading at $0.1367, up by roughly 1% in the last 24 hours. POL has also plummeted more than 2.61% in the past 7 days and nearly 33% in the past 30 days. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal raises concerns that the community suggests reverting to MATIC

2025/11/27 03:30

Polygon co-founder and CEO Sandeep Nailwal suggested on Wednesday to his followers whether the network should revert to its original ticker, MATIC. He said he was curious what the broader community thinks about the initiative.

Nailwal noted that the issue continues to surface in the Polygon trading community. He said that the community thinks MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker. The network’s co-founder also acknowledged that the ticker had history, recognition, and was stuck in people’s minds.

Nailwal sees zero chance that exchanges will agree to the revert

Nailwal told the Polygon community that reverting the ticker to MATIC on exchanges is too much churn. He maintained that the network has already migrated to POL and should stick to it. 

The firm’s CEO argued that a sufficient number of people are familiar with the POL ticker, especially in the X community. He revealed that the argument he keeps getting is that local businesses, which were aware of MATIC, wonder where the digital asset went.

Nailwal added that another debate he encounters is that projects shouldn’t be basing their decisions on what the X community thinks. He argued that Crypto Twitter represents less than 5% of the total crypto trading population.

Polygon’s CEO also disclosed that the recurring feedback from the community made him curious about what the broader community thinks about a revert. He believes that there are zero guarantees that exchanges will agree to the initiative, but still hinted that it might be a significant upgrade on their end.

Crypto officials ponder the revert

Abhinav Mehta, head of partnerships at Mansa Finance, argued that the revert is unnecessary, saying that change doesn’t happen overnight. He urged Nailwal not to double-think the decision. 

Mehta said there’s no point in calling Polygon a chain that went from one name to another just because others didn’t hear about it and ended up changing it back to the original. One member of the Polygon community believes the network should do more to promote POL, including more brand deals to boost mainstream adoption.

President of Open Campus, Mo Ezeldin, said the early adopters and supporters of Polygon recognized the token as MATIC. He also noted that there hasn’t been a new wave of retail entrants into the POL ecosystem. Ezeldin believes that going back to the original ticker might actually be the play for the network.

Abdul Rafay Gadit, co-founder of ZIG Chain, acknowledged that MATIC had a different vibe to it. He also argued that reverting the ticker wouldn’t solve the network’s core problem. He said the old chart has already reset, and it won’t come back.

Peter Kim, a marketer at Coinbase, suggested that Nailwal should focus on marketing POL better. He urged Polygon to start by putting the POL ticker name in official Polygon X accounts. He also believes that relisting POL on Robinhood might go a long way in its recognition.

Polygon upgraded its PoS to POL in September 2024 as the native staking token. A year later, the network announced that the upgrade to MATIC had successfully reached 99%. 

The firm maintained that the Polygon Portal interface still offers a 1:1 migration for users still holding MATIC. Polygon revealed that the upgrade provided more utility to the network’s cross-chain ecosystem interoperability solution, Agglayer. 

Polygon also disclosed that the network’s PoS will soon integrate with Agglayer. The firm stated that the initiative aims to bring POL into the broader aggregated network.

At the time of publication, POL is trading at $0.1367, up by roughly 1% in the last 24 hours. POL has also plummeted more than 2.61% in the past 7 days and nearly 33% in the past 30 days.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Can Bulls Defend the $2 Mark?

Can Bulls Defend the $2 Mark?

The post Can Bulls Defend the $2 Mark? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market is holding its breath as the Federal Reserve is widely expected to announce another rate cut next week. With an 86% probability of a 25-basis-point reduction, the move signals a shift in monetary policy—one that could ripple through traditional and digital markets alike. For XRP price, this decision comes at a critical juncture. The token is consolidating near the $2 mark, showing early signs of compression that could lead to a decisive breakout or breakdown. How the Fed’s Decision Could Influence XRP Price Prediction When the Fed lowers interest rates, liquidity usually flows toward higher-risk assets like cryptocurrencies. Investors see reduced borrowing costs as a green light to move capital away from bonds and into speculative sectors. In the short term, this could boost demand across the crypto market, especially for large-cap coins like XRP that have historically tracked broad market sentiment. However, this policy shift isn’t without risk. If the rate cut sparks fears of inflation, the dollar might weaken temporarily, boosting crypto prices, but an overheated market could later face correction once inflation pressures resurface. In essence, XRP’s near-term rally potential depends not only on the cut itself but on how investors interpret the Fed’s broader tone—whether it signals a short-term stimulus or a sustained dovish stance. Technical Analysis: XRP Price Faces a Tight Squeeze XRP/USD Daily chart- TradingView The XRP price daily chart shows price holding just above the $2.04 zone, hugging the lower Bollinger Band range. The bands have tightened, signaling a phase of volatility contraction. Historically, such setups precede large directional moves. The middle band (SMA 20) around $2.11 acts as immediate resistance, while the upper band near $2.28 defines the ceiling for bullish expansion. The Heikin Ashi candles show mild indecision—smaller bodies and wicks on both sides—hinting at market hesitation. A…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 13:43