The post The Internet Is Asking—What’s The Point Of Live-Action ‘Moana’? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Catherine Laga’aia as Moana Disney The first trailer for Disney’s latest live-action remake, Moana, left the internet asking one question—why? The trailer for Disney’s live-action Moana presents the film as almost identical to the original animated film, which was released in 2016. That’s less than a decade for a live-action nostalgia reboot, and the animated sequel was released only last year. The Moana trailer shows Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson returning as the shapeshifting demigod Maui, with Moana recast as Catherine Laga’aia, replacing Auliʻi Cravalho, who voiced Moana in both of the original animated films. The Internet Is Baffled By The Live-Action ‘Moana’ Remake Moana marks the shortest time between the release of the original animation and live-action remake, and the internet noted that this one seemed particularly unnecessary. Disney has released live-action remakes before, of course—many times—they’re something of a cash cow. Both The Jungle Book and The Lion King remakes pushed the boundaries of photorealistic GCI—the Moana trailer shows plenty of CGI too, more stylized than Lion King, but less cartoonish than the original film. The colorful setting and fantastical elements of Moana means that the live-action remake leans heavily on CGI, making it appear as though the characters are acting against a greenscreen for many of the shots. Fans questioned the point of remaking a CGI-animated film with a heavily CGI film, the live actors marking the only real distinction between the two. Of course, the film isn’t made for internet critics, but for families, kids and parents who already know they like Moana and would happily watch it again in a slightly new form. Despite the complaints of the internet, the film is almost guaranteed to rule the box office—Moana 2 made more than a billion, and so did live-action Lilo & Stitch (even if the altered… The post The Internet Is Asking—What’s The Point Of Live-Action ‘Moana’? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Catherine Laga’aia as Moana Disney The first trailer for Disney’s latest live-action remake, Moana, left the internet asking one question—why? The trailer for Disney’s live-action Moana presents the film as almost identical to the original animated film, which was released in 2016. That’s less than a decade for a live-action nostalgia reboot, and the animated sequel was released only last year. The Moana trailer shows Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson returning as the shapeshifting demigod Maui, with Moana recast as Catherine Laga’aia, replacing Auliʻi Cravalho, who voiced Moana in both of the original animated films. The Internet Is Baffled By The Live-Action ‘Moana’ Remake Moana marks the shortest time between the release of the original animation and live-action remake, and the internet noted that this one seemed particularly unnecessary. Disney has released live-action remakes before, of course—many times—they’re something of a cash cow. Both The Jungle Book and The Lion King remakes pushed the boundaries of photorealistic GCI—the Moana trailer shows plenty of CGI too, more stylized than Lion King, but less cartoonish than the original film. The colorful setting and fantastical elements of Moana means that the live-action remake leans heavily on CGI, making it appear as though the characters are acting against a greenscreen for many of the shots. Fans questioned the point of remaking a CGI-animated film with a heavily CGI film, the live actors marking the only real distinction between the two. Of course, the film isn’t made for internet critics, but for families, kids and parents who already know they like Moana and would happily watch it again in a slightly new form. Despite the complaints of the internet, the film is almost guaranteed to rule the box office—Moana 2 made more than a billion, and so did live-action Lilo & Stitch (even if the altered…

The Internet Is Asking—What’s The Point Of Live-Action ‘Moana’?

2025/11/19 10:39

Catherine Laga’aia as Moana

Disney

The first trailer for Disney’s latest live-action remake, Moana, left the internet asking one question—why?

The trailer for Disney’s live-action Moana presents the film as almost identical to the original animated film, which was released in 2016.

That’s less than a decade for a live-action nostalgia reboot, and the animated sequel was released only last year.

The Moana trailer shows Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson returning as the shapeshifting demigod Maui, with Moana recast as Catherine Laga’aia, replacing Auliʻi Cravalho, who voiced Moana in both of the original animated films.

The Internet Is Baffled By The Live-Action ‘Moana’ Remake

Moana marks the shortest time between the release of the original animation and live-action remake, and the internet noted that this one seemed particularly unnecessary.

Disney has released live-action remakes before, of course—many times—they’re something of a cash cow.

Both The Jungle Book and The Lion King remakes pushed the boundaries of photorealistic GCI—the Moana trailer shows plenty of CGI too, more stylized than Lion King, but less cartoonish than the original film.

The colorful setting and fantastical elements of Moana means that the live-action remake leans heavily on CGI, making it appear as though the characters are acting against a greenscreen for many of the shots.

Fans questioned the point of remaking a CGI-animated film with a heavily CGI film, the live actors marking the only real distinction between the two.

Of course, the film isn’t made for internet critics, but for families, kids and parents who already know they like Moana and would happily watch it again in a slightly new form.

Despite the complaints of the internet, the film is almost guaranteed to rule the box office—Moana 2 made more than a billion, and so did live-action Lilo & Stitch (even if the altered ending proved controversial).

Still, the slate of live-action remakes shows how Disney’s reputation is changing, as the studio once known for intricately crafted, original animated films is becoming a content factory—the news that AI-generated shorts are coming to Disney+ adds to this sense of disenchantment.

Live-action remakes are another symptom of nostalgia culture, but Disney’s haste to remake their animated library feels almost like a form of resource extraction.

Dreamworks recently followed in Disney’s footsteps, releasing a live-action remake of How To Train Your Dragon, which ended up making more than the original, and received positive reviews from audiences on Rotten Tomatoes.

Surely, live-action Frozen is only a matter of time, and live-action Tangled is already in development, but there will come a time when there’s nothing left to remake.

Could Pixar’s library be next? It seems heretical, but it is possible.

Any animated film featuring human protagonists could potentially be converted into live-action, even if it seems pointless to Disney fans.

Both Moana and Frozen have sequels (and Frozen 3 is incoming), so perhaps Disney can keep the live-action money train moving—plus, Encanto is right there.

MORE FROM FORBES

ForbesDisney Is About To Embrace Generative AI—And The Internet Is FuriousForbesThe Controversial Ending Of Disney’s New ‘Lilo & Stitch,’ ExplainedForbesWhat Is ‘Pluribus’ Really About?Forbes‘Family Guy’ Creator Seth McFarlane Explains ‘It Insists Upon Itself’ Meme

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2025/11/18/the-internet-is-asking-whats-the-point-of-live-action-moana/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Deploys Scorpion Strike Force Drones – But Do They Have Warheads?

U.S. Deploys Scorpion Strike Force Drones – But Do They Have Warheads?

The post U.S. Deploys Scorpion Strike Force Drones – But Do They Have Warheads? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LUCAS one way attack drone (with inert warhead) at Yuma Proving Ground U.S. Army Last week United Stated Central Command (CENTCOM) announced Task Force Scorpion Strike (TFSS), and that a squadron had already been formed, “the U.S. military’s first one-way-attack drone squadron,” based in the Middle East. The release includes images of the unit’s Low-cost Unmanned Combat Attack System (LUCAS) drones, reverse-engineered from Shaheds used by Iran and Russia. The announcement comes just four months after Pete Hegseth ordered an acceleration of the acquisition and fielding of affordable drone technology. The location in Iran’s back yard is hardly coincidental. Previously the U.S. could only launch small numbers of expensive legacy missiles. Now Scorpion Strike can unleash the sort of massive drone barrages that Russia regularly launches and “flip the script on Iran” as one U.S. official puts it. Or can it? Other information suggests LUCAS is far from ready for action. *Warhead Not Included? The U.S. Army also issued a press release last week, describing the testing of LUCAS at the Yuma Proving Ground (YPG). The image with the release shows a craft which looks identical to those displayed by CENTCOM. Scorpion Strike’s LUCAS drones CENTCOM YPG includes over 2,000 miles of restricted airspace in the desert, making it the ideal place to test long range systems. But there is no testing with live weapons yet. “We’re getting our baby steps in before we conduct safety certification testing,” states Col. Nicholas Law, Director of Experimentation in the Office of the Under Secretary of War for Research & Engineering, in the release. But it seems the warheads for the drones have not been made. “The warhead that will eventually be integrated into LUCAS isn’t constructed yet, but it will also be low-cost and mass produced by multiple manufacturers. Evaluators are currently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/09 19:03