ExchangeDEX+

Buy Crypto Markets Spot FuturesGOLD Earn Event Center

MANTRA has issued a warning to its community following a dispute with OKX over the exchange’s announcement of OM migration dates, which the project alleges violate official governance rules. The conflict intensified when OKX announced on December 5 that it would terminate its service and migrate to a new platform by the end of December. […]MANTRA has issued a warning to its community following a dispute with OKX over the exchange’s announcement of OM migration dates, which the project alleges violate official governance rules. The conflict intensified when OKX announced on December 5 that it would terminate its service and migrate to a new platform by the end of December. […]

Mantra CEO sounds alarm as OM migration clash with OKX intensifies

Author: Cryptopolitan

Source: Cryptopolitan

2025/12/09 08:11

3 min read

OM$0.06065+4.20%

CLASH$0.038606+0.28%

MANTRA has issued a warning to its community following a dispute with OKX over the exchange’s announcement of OM migration dates, which the project alleges violate official governance rules.

The conflict intensified when OKX announced on December 5 that it would terminate its service and migrate to a new platform by the end of December. MANTRA CEO JP Mullin claimed that the data is inaccurate and turns the process back to front, posing a risk that users will act on timelines that do not match Governance Proposal 26.

Governance mismatch and conflicting dates

The central issue is OKX’s assertion that the OM migration will occur between December 22 and December 25, 2025. According to MANTRA, the official governance proposal states that migration can only begin after the ERC-20 OM token has been fully deprecated. The deprecation deadline is January 15, 2026.

Proposal 26 also states that the migration date is conditional on the completion of additional technical review and does not assign any December dates to the conversion process.

The project also pointed out that OKX had announced several dates in December that were not discussed with MANTRA, including trading services, deposits, withdrawals, and a December 22 snapshot.

MANTRA claimed that no dates have been finalized regarding migration and emphasized that since April 13, the exchange has not communicated with the project regarding the specifics of migration.

Exchange-imposed suspension schedule

The December 5 announcement by OKX details significant changes to how OM trading will work. With OM, borrowing was to close on December 5, and between December 12 and December 19, the OM/USDT margin trading was to be suspended. OM-linked perpetual futures were to be delisted on December 15. Trading bots linked to the affected markets would gradually decrease in activity before each suspension.

OM pairs were to be paused in the spot market between December 19 and 22, and OKX said that all deposits, withdrawals and transfers would end at 03:00 UTC on December 22. The user balance record was recorded at the same time, with OKX stating that the migration would continue until December 25.

The exchange explained that no accounts with a balance below 10 OM would be converted and that only users with a KYC Level 2 or higher would be able to convert. During the migration period, OKX reported that information regarding OM valuation would be unavailable.

MANTRA CEO advises users to retain direct custody

Reacting to this, the MANTRA CEO encouraged users to take their OM out of OKX and migrate it through the official project channels as soon as the process becomes accessible. According to MANTRA, this method will ensure that their governance decisions are based on their own timeline, rather than an exchange-issued timeline, which aligns with Proposal 26.

The team added that every other big exchange has been aligning their preparations with MANTRA, and that the only exchange to announce dates without liaising with the project was OKX. MANTRA further indicated that it is determined to work with all OM retail holders during the transition and will continue to collaborate with the exchanges to ensure that the migration process is accurate and consistent.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Market Opportunity

MANTRA Price(OM)

$0.0606

$0.0606$0.0606

+4.73%

USD

MANTRA (OM) Live Price Chart

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?

Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:

Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story