The post South Korea Plans Bank-Level Compensation for Crypto Exchanges After Upbit’s Solana Token Breach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea is implementing bank-level no-fault compensation rules for crypto exchanges after the Upbit hack, requiring platforms to cover user losses from security breaches or system failures regardless of fault, enhancing consumer protection in the digital asset sector. South Korea’s Financial Services Commission is revising laws to apply no-fault liability to crypto exchanges, mirroring standards for banks under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. The Upbit incident on November 27 involved the unauthorized transfer of over 104 billion Solana-based tokens valued at 44.5 billion won, highlighting vulnerabilities in exchange security. Since 2023, major exchanges like Upbit, Bithumb, and others have reported 20 system failures affecting 900 users and causing more than 5 billion won in losses, per Financial Supervisory Service data. South Korea crypto exchange no-fault compensation rules aim to protect users post-Upbit hack. Learn how new regulations enhance security and stability in the crypto market—stay informed on key developments. What are South Korea’s new crypto exchange no-fault compensation rules? South Korea crypto exchange no-fault compensation rules will hold digital asset platforms accountable for customer losses due to hacks, system outages, or other failures, even if the exchange is not directly at fault. These measures, led by the Financial Services Commission, extend protections similar to those for banks under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. The initiative addresses recent vulnerabilities exposed by incidents like the Upbit breach, aiming to build trust in the crypto ecosystem. How did the Upbit hack influence these regulatory changes? The Upbit hack on November 27 prompted swift regulatory action when over 104 billion Solana-based tokens, equivalent to approximately 44.5 billion won or $30.1 million, were transferred to external wallets within an hour. Operated by Dunamu, Upbit detected the breach around 5 a.m. but delayed reporting to the Financial Supervisory Service until nearly 11 a.m., raising concerns about… The post South Korea Plans Bank-Level Compensation for Crypto Exchanges After Upbit’s Solana Token Breach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea is implementing bank-level no-fault compensation rules for crypto exchanges after the Upbit hack, requiring platforms to cover user losses from security breaches or system failures regardless of fault, enhancing consumer protection in the digital asset sector. South Korea’s Financial Services Commission is revising laws to apply no-fault liability to crypto exchanges, mirroring standards for banks under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. The Upbit incident on November 27 involved the unauthorized transfer of over 104 billion Solana-based tokens valued at 44.5 billion won, highlighting vulnerabilities in exchange security. Since 2023, major exchanges like Upbit, Bithumb, and others have reported 20 system failures affecting 900 users and causing more than 5 billion won in losses, per Financial Supervisory Service data. South Korea crypto exchange no-fault compensation rules aim to protect users post-Upbit hack. Learn how new regulations enhance security and stability in the crypto market—stay informed on key developments. What are South Korea’s new crypto exchange no-fault compensation rules? South Korea crypto exchange no-fault compensation rules will hold digital asset platforms accountable for customer losses due to hacks, system outages, or other failures, even if the exchange is not directly at fault. These measures, led by the Financial Services Commission, extend protections similar to those for banks under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. The initiative addresses recent vulnerabilities exposed by incidents like the Upbit breach, aiming to build trust in the crypto ecosystem. How did the Upbit hack influence these regulatory changes? The Upbit hack on November 27 prompted swift regulatory action when over 104 billion Solana-based tokens, equivalent to approximately 44.5 billion won or $30.1 million, were transferred to external wallets within an hour. Operated by Dunamu, Upbit detected the breach around 5 a.m. but delayed reporting to the Financial Supervisory Service until nearly 11 a.m., raising concerns about…

South Korea Plans Bank-Level Compensation for Crypto Exchanges After Upbit’s Solana Token Breach

2025/12/07 15:46
  • South Korea’s Financial Services Commission is revising laws to apply no-fault liability to crypto exchanges, mirroring standards for banks under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.

  • The Upbit incident on November 27 involved the unauthorized transfer of over 104 billion Solana-based tokens valued at 44.5 billion won, highlighting vulnerabilities in exchange security.

  • Since 2023, major exchanges like Upbit, Bithumb, and others have reported 20 system failures affecting 900 users and causing more than 5 billion won in losses, per Financial Supervisory Service data.

South Korea crypto exchange no-fault compensation rules aim to protect users post-Upbit hack. Learn how new regulations enhance security and stability in the crypto market—stay informed on key developments.

What are South Korea’s new crypto exchange no-fault compensation rules?

South Korea crypto exchange no-fault compensation rules will hold digital asset platforms accountable for customer losses due to hacks, system outages, or other failures, even if the exchange is not directly at fault. These measures, led by the Financial Services Commission, extend protections similar to those for banks under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. The initiative addresses recent vulnerabilities exposed by incidents like the Upbit breach, aiming to build trust in the crypto ecosystem.

How did the Upbit hack influence these regulatory changes?

The Upbit hack on November 27 prompted swift regulatory action when over 104 billion Solana-based tokens, equivalent to approximately 44.5 billion won or $30.1 million, were transferred to external wallets within an hour. Operated by Dunamu, Upbit detected the breach around 5 a.m. but delayed reporting to the Financial Supervisory Service until nearly 11 a.m., raising concerns about transparency. This incident, combined with a history of 20 system failures across South Korea’s top five exchanges since 2023, has affected over 900 users and resulted in more than 5 billion won in losses, according to data from the Financial Supervisory Service. Lawmakers and analysts, as cited in reports from The Korea Times, emphasize that such events underscore the need for robust safeguards. The proposed rules would impose stricter IT security mandates, elevated operational protocols, and penalties up to 3% of an exchange’s annual revenue for security lapses— a threshold already applied to banks. Currently, fines for crypto platforms are capped at $3.4 million, which regulators view as insufficient. Political scrutiny has intensified, with some alleging the reporting delay coincided suspiciously with Dunamu’s merger with Naver Financial, further fueling calls for accountability.

Frequently Asked Questions

What penalties will crypto exchanges face under South Korea’s no-fault compensation framework?

Under the new framework, South Korean crypto exchanges could face fines of up to 3% of their annual revenue for hacking incidents or system failures, aligning with bank penalties. This replaces the current $3.4 million cap, ensuring proportional accountability. The Financial Services Commission aims to enforce these through upcoming legislative revisions, promoting higher security standards across the sector.

Why is South Korea accelerating stablecoin regulations alongside exchange protections?

South Korean lawmakers are urging regulators to submit a stablecoin bill by December 10 to establish clear guidelines for these assets amid growing market adoption. If delayed, the ruling party plans to advance it independently, targeting debate in the National Assembly’s January 2026 session. This push addresses stability risks and integrates with broader efforts to safeguard users, as highlighted in discussions around pragmatic crypto privacy measures for the coming year.

Key Takeaways

  • Enhanced User Protection: No-fault compensation ensures crypto exchanges reimburse losses from breaches, similar to traditional banks, fostering greater investor confidence.
  • Stricter Penalties and Standards: Fines up to 3% of revenue and mandatory IT upgrades will address the 20+ failures reported since 2023 by major platforms.
  • Regulatory Momentum: Alongside exchange rules, a stablecoin bill deadline of December 10 signals South Korea’s commitment to a secure digital finance landscape—monitor updates for compliance impacts.

Conclusion

South Korea’s push for crypto exchange no-fault compensation and stablecoin regulations marks a pivotal step in aligning digital assets with traditional finance safeguards, driven by the Upbit hack and ongoing system vulnerabilities. By imposing bank-level accountability, the Financial Services Commission and lawmakers aim to mitigate risks and protect over 900 affected users from recent incidents. As these provisions evolve, exchanges must prioritize security enhancements; investors should stay vigilant and consult authoritative financial analyses from sources like The Korea Times for ongoing developments in this dynamic regulatory environment.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/south-korea-plans-bank-level-compensation-for-crypto-exchanges-after-upbits-solana-token-breach

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37