Most projects we see here are *totally useless* and won't exist for more than a few months. Most will be abandoned in 3 weeks when the founder realizes nobody wants to pay for their "revolutionary" todo app with AI. "AI-Powered" means nothing anymore.Most projects we see here are *totally useless* and won't exist for more than a few months. Most will be abandoned in 3 weeks when the founder realizes nobody wants to pay for their "revolutionary" todo app with AI. "AI-Powered" means nothing anymore.

Stop Building "AI-Powered" Sh*t. The SaaS Gold Rush is a Trap

2025/12/09 20:19

"Check out my SaaS directory list" - nobody cares

"I Hit 10k MRR in 30 Days: Here's How" - stop lying

"I created an AI-powered chatbot" - no, you wrapped OpenAI's API

"Built my MVP in 48 hours with Cursor" - congrats, so did 50,000 other people this week

Most projects we see here are totally useless and won't exist for more than a few months. Actually, scratch that and most will be abandoned in 3 weeks when the founder realizes nobody wants to pay for their "revolutionary" todo app with AI.

And the culprit is you

Yes, you, who thought you'd get rich by:

  • Watching a 47-minute YouTube video titled "I Built a $10k/month SaaS with AI (You Can Too!)"
  • Spending 6 hours "coding" in Cursor (you mean prompting)
  • Slapping together NextJS + Supabase + PostgreSQL + Vercel
  • Adding "AI-Powered" to your landing page (it's literally just a ChatGPT wrapper)
  • Posting on 47 Reddit communities asking for "feedback" (begging for users)
  • Getting 3 signups (your mom, your best friend, and a bot)
  • Wondering why you're not a millionaire yet

Just because AI tools like Cursor, v0, and ChatGPT can help you code faster doesn't mean every AI-generated SaaS needs to exist.

We've seen this movie before

Remember when everyone was:

  • Launching crypto tokens → "This will revolutionize payments!" (Rugpulled in 6 months)
  • Minting NFTs → "Digital art is the future!" (Floor price: $0)
  • Dropshipping fidget spinners → "Passive income!" (Banned by Shopify)
  • Creating courses → "Share your expertise!" (12 sales, all refunded)
  • Starting agencies → "I'll manage your social media!" (Client ghosted after 2 weeks)

And now: Building AI SaaS → "Cursor will make me rich!" (0 MRR after 4 months)

Different costumes, same empty promises.

The harsh truth nobody tells you

1. Your SaaS isn't special

There are 47,000+ SaaS products launched every year. Most die within 12 months.

Why? Because you didn't solve a problem but you created a solution looking for a problem.

Nobody wakes up thinking: "Man, I really wish there was an AI-powered calendar that summarizes my meetings and sends me a haiku about my productivity."

2. "AI-Powered" means nothing anymore

Every SaaS now has "AI" slapped on it:

  • AI project management (it's Trello with GPT)
  • AI email assistant (Gmail + OpenAI API)
  • AI note-taking (Notion clone with embeddings)
  • AI analytics (charts + ChatGPT summaries)

Customers don't care about AI. They care about solving their problem faster, cheaper, or better.

If your only differentiator is "we added AI," you have no differentiator.

3. Tech stack doesn't matter (yet you obsess over it)

You spend 40 hours debating:

  • "Should I use NextJS or Remix?"
  • "Supabase or Firebase?"
  • "TailwindCSS or Chakra UI?"
  • "Vercel or Netlify?"

Nobody gives a shit.

Your customers don't care if you built it in NextJS, PHP, or hand-coded assembly. They care if it solves their problem.

Dropbox's MVP was a video. Airbnb's MVP was Craigslist + a camera. Stripe's first version couldn't even handle edge cases.

Stop optimizing your tech stack. Start talking to customers.

4. You're not a founder. You're a code monkey with delusions

Real founders:

  • Spend 80% of time talking to customers
  • Understand sales, marketing, distribution
  • Obsess over problem-solution fit
  • Build in public and iterate based on feedback
  • Know their numbers (CAC, LTV, churn, MRR)

Fake founders:

  • Spend 80% of time "perfecting" the product
  • Think "if I build it, they will come"
  • Launch on Product Hunt and wonder why nobody cares
  • Have zero customers but "plan to monetize later"
  • Refuse to do sales because "I'm technical, not a salesperson"

If you can't sell, you can't build a business. Period.

5. The only people making money are selling you the dream

That YouTuber with "How I Built a $50k/month SaaS"?

  • Their SaaS makes $2k/month
  • Their course about building SaaS makes $48k/month

That "indie hacker" with a Twitter following?

  • Their product makes $5k/month
  • Their paid community/newsletter makes $30k/month

That "AI automation agency" guy?

  • His agency has 2 clients
  • His "agency blueprint" course has 847 students at $297 each

They're not experts. They're salespeople. And they're good at one thing: making you believe you're just one AI prompt, one tech stack, one "secret framework" away from financial freedom.

You're not.

What we actually need to do (the uncomfortable truth):

1. Stop building. Start validating

Before you write a single line of code:

  • Talk to 50 potential customers
  • Ask: "What's your biggest pain point with [X]?"
  • Ask: "How do you currently solve this?"
  • Ask: "Would you pay $[price] to solve this?"
  • If 30+ say "yes," you might have something

If you can't find 50 people to talk to, you don't understand your market.

2. Solve problems you've personally experienced

The best SaaS founders build solutions to their own problems:

  • Notion → Frustrated with clunky wikis
  • Superhuman → Email was too slow
  • Linear → Jira was a nightmare
  • Figma → Design tools were desktop-only

What problem are you so frustrated with that you'd build a solution even if nobody paid you?

If your answer is "I saw a gap in the market," you're already wrong.

3. Build expertise, not MVPs

Stop launching half-baked products every month. Start building deep expertise in one domain.

Spend 6-12 months:

  • Learning everything about a specific industry
  • Talking to practitioners daily
  • Understanding workflows, pain points, budgets
  • Building a reputation as someone who "gets it"

Then build a solution.

4. Learn sales first, code second

Controversial take: You don't need to code to build a SaaS.

You need to:

  • Identify a painful problem
  • Sell the solution before it exists
  • Hire developers to build it
  • Sell more, iterate, scale

If you're "technical" but can't sell, you're not a founder then you're an engineer looking for a co-founder who'll do the hard part.

Learn sales. Learn copywriting. Learn positioning. Then worry about your tech stack.

5. Build for purpose, not profit (initially)

If your only goal is "make money," you'll quit the moment it gets hard.

The best founders are obsessed with the problem:

  • They'd work on it even without pay
  • They can talk about it for hours
  • They have strong opinions about the industry
  • They've been thinking about this for years

If you're just chasing "passive income," go buy index funds.

Take a breath and ask yourself:

  • What am I genuinely world-class at? (Not "pretty good"—world-class)
  • What problems do I understand better than 99% of people?
  • What could I talk about for 3 hours without notes?
  • What industry do I have insider knowledge about?
  • What would I build even if I knew it would never make money?

If you can't answer these, you're not ready to build a SaaS. You're ready to learn, research, and gain experience.

Let's stop the madness

Stop building:

  • Another AI chatbot
  • Another project management tool "with AI"
  • Another no-code directory
  • Another "Notion alternative"
  • Another Chrome extension that "boosts productivity"

Start building:

  • Deep expertise in a specific domain
  • Relationships with potential customers
  • Sales and marketing skills
  • Financial literacy (understand unit economics)
  • Resilience (because 99% of startups fail)

A brutal reality check

🔴 95% of SaaS products fail

🔴 Only 1% reach $1M ARR

🔴 40% of startups fail due to no market need

🔴 Average time to profitability: 3-5 years(not 30 days)

🔴Most "successful" indie hackers have 5+ failed products behind them

Still want to build a SaaS? Good.

But do it for the right reasons:

  • Because you're obsessed with solving a specific problem
  • Because you have unique insights others don't
  • Because you're willing to spend years learning and iterating
  • Because you understand that coding is 10% of the work

Not because some YouTuber said you could get rich quick with Cursor and NextJS.

Final thoughts:

I'm not saying don't use AI tools. I'm not saying don't build products.

I'm saying: Stop building thoughtless garbage that adds zero value to the world.

If your elevator pitch is "It's like [successful product] but with AI," you don't have a business. You have a copycat with a ChatGPT API key.

If you can't explain why your product needs to exist in one sentence without mentioning "AI," "ML," or "automation," you haven't found product-market fit.

And if your go-to-market strategy is "post on Reddit and hope," you're not serious about building a business.

Build less. Think more. Sell first. Code last.

That's the formula. Everything else is noise.

TL;DR:

  • Stop building AI-powered clones with Cursor
  • Tech stack doesn't matter if you have no customers
  • The only people making money are selling courses
  • Learn sales before you learn to code
  • Solve problems you deeply understand
  • Build expertise, not MVPs
  • 95% of SaaS products fail so don't be a statistic

Now go delete your "revolutionary AI SaaS" and start talking to real humans about real problems.

Or don't. Your choice. Just don't complain when your "10k MRR in 30 days" turns into "$0 MRR after 6 months."

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

MoneyGram launches stablecoin-powered app in Colombia

MoneyGram launches stablecoin-powered app in Colombia

The post MoneyGram launches stablecoin-powered app in Colombia appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MoneyGram has launched a new mobile application in Colombia that uses USD-pegged stablecoins to modernize cross-border remittances. According to an announcement on Wednesday, the app allows customers to receive money instantly into a US dollar balance backed by Circle’s USDC stablecoin, which can be stored, spent, or cashed out through MoneyGram’s global retail network. The rollout is designed to address the volatility of local currencies, particularly the Colombian peso. Built on the Stellar blockchain and supported by wallet infrastructure provider Crossmint, the app marks MoneyGram’s most significant move yet to integrate stablecoins into consumer-facing services. Colombia was selected as the first market due to its heavy reliance on inbound remittances—families in the country receive more than 22 times the amount they send abroad, according to Statista. The announcement said future expansions will target other remittance-heavy markets. MoneyGram, which has nearly 500,000 retail locations globally, has experimented with blockchain rails since partnering with the Stellar Development Foundation in 2021. It has since built cash on and off ramps for stablecoins, developed APIs for crypto integration, and incorporated stablecoins into its internal settlement processes. “This launch is the first step toward a world where every person, everywhere, has access to dollar stablecoins,” CEO Anthony Soohoo stated. The company emphasized compliance, citing decades of regulatory experience, though stablecoin oversight remains fluid. The US Congress passed the GENIUS Act earlier this year, establishing a framework for stablecoin regulation, which MoneyGram has pointed to as providing clearer guardrails. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/moneygram-stablecoin-app-colombia
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:04
Standard Chartered: Bitcoin Halving Cycles Are Over

Standard Chartered: Bitcoin Halving Cycles Are Over

The post Standard Chartered: Bitcoin Halving Cycles Are Over appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Banking giant Standard Chartered believes that Bitcoin’s four-year cycles are already over.  Historically, Bitcoin price movements have been strongly tied to “halving” events (when the block reward for mining Bitcoin is cut in half, roughly every 4 years). Typically, prices would peak about 18 months after a halving. However, Standard Chartered argues that this old logic no longer reliably predicts price cycles following the introduction of Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S.  The rationale is that ETFs make Bitcoin more accessible to mainstream investors. For this new dynamic to be proven, BTC would need to break its current all-time high of $126,000. They expect this breakout could happen in the first half of 2026.  Standard Chartered has also lowered its BTC price predictions for the following years (from $200,000 to $100,000 in 2025, from $300,000 to $200,000 in 2026, from $400,000 to $225,000 in 2027, and from $500,000 to $300,000).  You Might Also Like Bitcoin is currently changing hands at $90,397, according to CoinGecko data.  On the same page  Apart from Standard Chartered, there are quite a few analysts and market watchers who argue that the traditional Bitcoin halving cycle is no longer relevant.  In a recent research note, Bernstein analysts assert that the traditional four‑year halving cycle is effectively over due to Bitcoin ETFs dominating the scene. CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju also claims that the flagship cryptocurrency no longer follows four-year cycles, citing institutional buying power.  That said, it remains to be seen whether BTC will be able to reclaim its current all-time high next year.  Source: https://u.today/standard-chartered-bitcoin-halving-cycles-are-over
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/10 02:46