The post Michael Saylor Opposes Zcash-Style Privacy for Bitcoin, Citing Shutdown Risk appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Zcash co-founder Eli Ben-Sasson has revealed a conversation he had with Strategy’s co-founder Michael Saylor, in which Saylor opposed the idea of privacy for Bitcoin. Saylor also explained why he doesn’t think BTC should have privacy, especially the kind of privacy that Zcash has. Michael Saylor Pushes Back On Zcash-Style Privacy For Bitcoin In an X post, Eli Ben-Sasson stated that Saylor opined that Bitcoin shouldn’t have privacy, at least not Zcash style, because that would allow nation states to shut down the flagship crypto. However, the Zcash co-founder disagreed, stating that there was a way to “have the cake and eat it too,” by allowing viewing keys alongside shielding. This comes as the privacy narrative continues to heat up. As CoinGape reported, VanEck’s CEO, Jan van Eck, recently claimed that BTC OGs were exploring Zcash due to its much stronger privacy amid quantum threats and traceability concerns. Meanwhile, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes earlier described Zcash as “Bitcoin with complete privacy,” which is why he believes that the privacy token could reach 10% to 20% of the flagship crypto’s value in this cycle. Crypto asset manager Grayscale had also described Zcash as being similar to Bitcoin in its design. Grayscale stated that ZEC was created from the original Bitcoin code base, but uses a privacy technology that encrypts transaction information and allows users to shield their assets. Notably, Grayscale recently filed for a Zcash spot ETF, which has further put the spotlight on the privacy coin. Zcash Advocate Mert Criticizes Saylor’s Statement In an X post, Zcash and privacy advocate Mert described Saylor’s comment as “disappointing.” He noted that files, chats, and photos can be encrypted, and so, encrypting money must be normal. hard to articulate how disappointing this is you encrypt your files, chats, and dog photos; encrypting money *must*… The post Michael Saylor Opposes Zcash-Style Privacy for Bitcoin, Citing Shutdown Risk appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Zcash co-founder Eli Ben-Sasson has revealed a conversation he had with Strategy’s co-founder Michael Saylor, in which Saylor opposed the idea of privacy for Bitcoin. Saylor also explained why he doesn’t think BTC should have privacy, especially the kind of privacy that Zcash has. Michael Saylor Pushes Back On Zcash-Style Privacy For Bitcoin In an X post, Eli Ben-Sasson stated that Saylor opined that Bitcoin shouldn’t have privacy, at least not Zcash style, because that would allow nation states to shut down the flagship crypto. However, the Zcash co-founder disagreed, stating that there was a way to “have the cake and eat it too,” by allowing viewing keys alongside shielding. This comes as the privacy narrative continues to heat up. As CoinGape reported, VanEck’s CEO, Jan van Eck, recently claimed that BTC OGs were exploring Zcash due to its much stronger privacy amid quantum threats and traceability concerns. Meanwhile, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes earlier described Zcash as “Bitcoin with complete privacy,” which is why he believes that the privacy token could reach 10% to 20% of the flagship crypto’s value in this cycle. Crypto asset manager Grayscale had also described Zcash as being similar to Bitcoin in its design. Grayscale stated that ZEC was created from the original Bitcoin code base, but uses a privacy technology that encrypts transaction information and allows users to shield their assets. Notably, Grayscale recently filed for a Zcash spot ETF, which has further put the spotlight on the privacy coin. Zcash Advocate Mert Criticizes Saylor’s Statement In an X post, Zcash and privacy advocate Mert described Saylor’s comment as “disappointing.” He noted that files, chats, and photos can be encrypted, and so, encrypting money must be normal. hard to articulate how disappointing this is you encrypt your files, chats, and dog photos; encrypting money *must*…

Michael Saylor Opposes Zcash-Style Privacy for Bitcoin, Citing Shutdown Risk

2025/12/06 04:40

Zcash co-founder Eli Ben-Sasson has revealed a conversation he had with Strategy’s co-founder Michael Saylor, in which Saylor opposed the idea of privacy for Bitcoin. Saylor also explained why he doesn’t think BTC should have privacy, especially the kind of privacy that Zcash has.

Michael Saylor Pushes Back On Zcash-Style Privacy For Bitcoin

In an X post, Eli Ben-Sasson stated that Saylor opined that Bitcoin shouldn’t have privacy, at least not Zcash style, because that would allow nation states to shut down the flagship crypto. However, the Zcash co-founder disagreed, stating that there was a way to “have the cake and eat it too,” by allowing viewing keys alongside shielding.

This comes as the privacy narrative continues to heat up. As CoinGape reported, VanEck’s CEO, Jan van Eck, recently claimed that BTC OGs were exploring Zcash due to its much stronger privacy amid quantum threats and traceability concerns.

Meanwhile, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes earlier described Zcash as “Bitcoin with complete privacy,” which is why he believes that the privacy token could reach 10% to 20% of the flagship crypto’s value in this cycle.

Crypto asset manager Grayscale had also described Zcash as being similar to Bitcoin in its design. Grayscale stated that ZEC was created from the original Bitcoin code base, but uses a privacy technology that encrypts transaction information and allows users to shield their assets. Notably, Grayscale recently filed for a Zcash spot ETF, which has further put the spotlight on the privacy coin.

Zcash Advocate Mert Criticizes Saylor’s Statement

In an X post, Zcash and privacy advocate Mert described Saylor’s comment as “disappointing.” He noted that files, chats, and photos can be encrypted, and so, encrypting money must be normal.

Mert further remarked that the entire premise of the crypto industry is “internet money that is free from any single nation,” but that the industry appears to be moving in the opposite direction, likely making Bitcoin and other non-privacy crypto assets susceptible to government control.

Mert had earlier mentioned that encrypted money on the internet was the principal reason why the cypherpunks created Bitcoin and crypto in the first place. He also noted that as crypto continues to gain widespread adoption, many people and institutions will realize that their transactions are transparent and that anything they do on-chain can serve as evidence against them.

He further stated that institutions are realizing this, which is why confidential transfers are now on the Solana network because these institutions requested them. Ripple developers also included integrated privacy tools on the XRP Ledger (XRPL) into their roadmap as they look to onboard institutions.

Meanwhile, Mert alluded to the fact that certain jurisdictions in Europe are slowly rolling out CBDCs with proposed spending limits, which makes privacy necessary on blockchains, including Bitcoin. He also expects to see these nations pass legislations that invade people’s privacy, making privacy necessary for crypto assets.

Source: https://coingape.com/michael-saylor-opposes-zcash-style-privacy-for-bitcoin-citing-shutdown-risk/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09