Author: AJC; Source: Messari's upcoming "Crypto Themes for 2026" Cryptocurrency drives industry development Refocusing on cryptocurrencies is crucial because this is where most of the capital in the industry ultimately seeks to invest. The total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies is $3.26 trillion. Of this, Bitcoin (BTC) accounts for $1.80 trillion, or 55%. Of the remaining $1.45 trillion, approximately $0.83 trillion is concentrated in altcoins (L1), which together account for approximately $2.63 trillion (about 81% of all cryptocurrency capitalization), allocated to assets already regarded as currencies or perceived as potentially receiving a currency premium. Therefore, whether you are a trader, investor, capital allocator, or portfolio builder, understanding how the market allocates and withdraws currency premiums is crucial. In the cryptocurrency space, nothing influences valuation more than whether the market is willing to treat an asset as currency. Thus, predicting where future currency premiums will accumulate is arguably one of the most important elements in portfolio construction within this industry. So far, our focus has been primarily on Bitcoin, but other assets worth $0.83 trillion are also worth exploring; they may or may not be considered currencies. We expect Bitcoin to continue gaining market share from gold and other non-sovereign wealth stores in the coming years. But where does this leave L1? Does a rise in L1 mean all assets benefit, or will Bitcoin partially compensate for its gap with gold by extracting a monetary premium from L1? First, it's helpful to understand the current valuation levels of Level 1 (L1). The top four L1 tokens—Ethereum ($361.15 billion), XRP ($130.11 billion), BNB ($120.64 billion), and SOL ($74.68 billion)—have a combined market capitalization of $686.58 billion, representing 83% of the L1 market. Beyond the top four, valuations drop rapidly (TRX's market capitalization is $26.67 billion), but interestingly, the long tail remains quite substantial. The total market capitalization of L1 tokens outside the top 15 is $18.06 billion, representing 2% of the total L1 market capitalization. Importantly, L1 market capitalization does not fully reflect the implied currency premium. There are three main L1 valuation frameworks: Currency premium Real economic value (REV), and The need for economic security Therefore, the market value of a project is not simply a result of the market treating it as currency. Currency premium, rather than revenue, is the main driver of L1 valuation. Despite these competing valuation frameworks, the market increasingly favors evaluating L1s from a revenue-driven perspective rather than a currency premium perspective. Over the past few years, the overall price-to-sales ratio (P/S) for all L1s with a market capitalization exceeding $1 billion has remained relatively stable, typically between 150 and 200x. However, this overall figure is misleading because it includes TRON and Hyperliquid. In the past 30 days, TRX and HYPE generated 70% of the group's revenue but only accounted for 4% of its market capitalization. After removing these two outliers, the truth becomes clear: even as revenue declined, the L1 valuation continued to rise. The adjusted price-to-sales ratio also continued to increase. November 30, 2021 - 40x November 30, 2022 - 212x November 30, 2023 - 137 times November 30, 2024 - 205x November 30, 2025 - 536x An explanation based on actual economic value might suggest that the market is simply pricing in future revenue growth. However, this explanation doesn't hold up to scrutiny. In the same L1 token portfolio (still excluding TRON and Hyperliquid), revenue declined in all but one year: 2021 – US$12.33 billion 2022 – US$4.89 billion (down 60% year-on-year) 2023 – $2.72 billion (down 44% year-on-year) 2024 – US$3.55 billion (31% year-on-year growth) 2025 – $1.7 billion annualized (down 52% year-over-year) We believe the simplest and most direct explanation is that these valuations are driven by a currency premium, rather than by current or future income. L1 tokens continue to underperform Bitcoin. If L1 valuations are driven by expectations of currency premiums, the next step is to understand what factors shape these expectations. A simple test is to compare L1 price performance with BTC. If currency premium expectations primarily reflect BTC's price movements, then these assets should perform similarly to BTC's beta. On the other hand, if currency premium expectations are driven by factors specific to each L1 asset, then we expect them to have a much weaker correlation with BTC and exhibit more idiosyncratic behavior. As a proxy metric for L1, we examined the performance of the top ten L1 tokens by market capitalization (excluding HYPE) relative to Bitcoin (BTC) since December 1, 2022. These ten assets represent approximately 94% of the total L1 market capitalization and are therefore representative of the sector as a whole. During this period, eight of these ten assets underperformed Bitcoin in absolute terms, with six lagging behind Bitcoin by 40% or more. Only two assets outperformed Bitcoin: XRP and SOL. XRP's excess return was only 3%, and given that XRP's historical fund flows have primarily come from retail investors, we will not overemphasize this return. The only asset that significantly outperformed Bitcoin was SOL, with a return 87% higher than Bitcoin's. A deeper analysis of SOL's seemingly superior performance reveals that it may actually be underperforming. During the same period that SOL outperformed BTC by 87%, Solana's fundamentals exhibited parabolic growth. Total DeFi locked value increased by 2988%, transaction fees by 1983%, and DEX trading volume by 3301%. By any measure, Solana's ecosystem has grown 20 to 30 times since the end of 2022. However, as an asset designed to capture this growth, SOL has only outperformed BTC by 87%. Read it again. To achieve significant excess returns in the game against BTC, the L1 crypto ecosystem needs more than just 200-300% growth. It needs 2000-3000% growth to generate double-digit excess returns. In conclusion, we believe that although L1 valuations are still based on expectations of future currency premiums, market confidence in these expectations is quietly weakening. At the same time, the market has not lost confidence in BTC's currency premium, and BTC's lead over L1 is widening. While cryptocurrencies technically don't require transaction fees or revenue to support their valuations, these metrics are crucial for L1. Unlike Bitcoin, the core value of L1 lies in building an ecosystem (including applications, users, throughput, economic activity, etc.) that underpins its token. However, if L1's ecosystem usage declines year after year, partly due to reduced transaction fees and revenue, then L1 will lose its sole competitive advantage over Bitcoin. Without genuine economic growth, the market will find it increasingly difficult to believe in these L1 cryptocurrency narratives. Looking to the future Looking ahead, we expect this trend to continue into 2026 and beyond. With a few exceptions, we anticipate Bitcoin will continue to erode the market share of other L1 assets. Their valuations are primarily driven by expectations of future currency premiums, which will steadily decline as the market increasingly recognizes Bitcoin as the most competitive cryptocurrency. While Bitcoin will face challenges in the coming years, these issues are unclear and influenced by numerous unknowns, insufficient to substantially support the current currency premiums of other L1 assets. For L1 platforms, the burden of proof has shifted. Their narratives are no longer as convincing as Bitcoin's, and they cannot rely indefinitely on widespread market frenzy to support their valuations. The era when the idea that "we might one day become money" was enough to justify trillion-dollar valuations is over. Investors now have access to a decade's worth of data showing that L1's currency premium has only been sustainable during periods of rapid platform growth. Aside from these rare periods of explosive growth, L1 has consistently lagged behind Bitcoin, and when growth slows, the currency premium disappears.Author: AJC; Source: Messari's upcoming "Crypto Themes for 2026" Cryptocurrency drives industry development Refocusing on cryptocurrencies is crucial because this is where most of the capital in the industry ultimately seeks to invest. The total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies is $3.26 trillion. Of this, Bitcoin (BTC) accounts for $1.80 trillion, or 55%. Of the remaining $1.45 trillion, approximately $0.83 trillion is concentrated in altcoins (L1), which together account for approximately $2.63 trillion (about 81% of all cryptocurrency capitalization), allocated to assets already regarded as currencies or perceived as potentially receiving a currency premium. Therefore, whether you are a trader, investor, capital allocator, or portfolio builder, understanding how the market allocates and withdraws currency premiums is crucial. In the cryptocurrency space, nothing influences valuation more than whether the market is willing to treat an asset as currency. Thus, predicting where future currency premiums will accumulate is arguably one of the most important elements in portfolio construction within this industry. So far, our focus has been primarily on Bitcoin, but other assets worth $0.83 trillion are also worth exploring; they may or may not be considered currencies. We expect Bitcoin to continue gaining market share from gold and other non-sovereign wealth stores in the coming years. But where does this leave L1? Does a rise in L1 mean all assets benefit, or will Bitcoin partially compensate for its gap with gold by extracting a monetary premium from L1? First, it's helpful to understand the current valuation levels of Level 1 (L1). The top four L1 tokens—Ethereum ($361.15 billion), XRP ($130.11 billion), BNB ($120.64 billion), and SOL ($74.68 billion)—have a combined market capitalization of $686.58 billion, representing 83% of the L1 market. Beyond the top four, valuations drop rapidly (TRX's market capitalization is $26.67 billion), but interestingly, the long tail remains quite substantial. The total market capitalization of L1 tokens outside the top 15 is $18.06 billion, representing 2% of the total L1 market capitalization. Importantly, L1 market capitalization does not fully reflect the implied currency premium. There are three main L1 valuation frameworks: Currency premium Real economic value (REV), and The need for economic security Therefore, the market value of a project is not simply a result of the market treating it as currency. Currency premium, rather than revenue, is the main driver of L1 valuation. Despite these competing valuation frameworks, the market increasingly favors evaluating L1s from a revenue-driven perspective rather than a currency premium perspective. Over the past few years, the overall price-to-sales ratio (P/S) for all L1s with a market capitalization exceeding $1 billion has remained relatively stable, typically between 150 and 200x. However, this overall figure is misleading because it includes TRON and Hyperliquid. In the past 30 days, TRX and HYPE generated 70% of the group's revenue but only accounted for 4% of its market capitalization. After removing these two outliers, the truth becomes clear: even as revenue declined, the L1 valuation continued to rise. The adjusted price-to-sales ratio also continued to increase. November 30, 2021 - 40x November 30, 2022 - 212x November 30, 2023 - 137 times November 30, 2024 - 205x November 30, 2025 - 536x An explanation based on actual economic value might suggest that the market is simply pricing in future revenue growth. However, this explanation doesn't hold up to scrutiny. In the same L1 token portfolio (still excluding TRON and Hyperliquid), revenue declined in all but one year: 2021 – US$12.33 billion 2022 – US$4.89 billion (down 60% year-on-year) 2023 – $2.72 billion (down 44% year-on-year) 2024 – US$3.55 billion (31% year-on-year growth) 2025 – $1.7 billion annualized (down 52% year-over-year) We believe the simplest and most direct explanation is that these valuations are driven by a currency premium, rather than by current or future income. L1 tokens continue to underperform Bitcoin. If L1 valuations are driven by expectations of currency premiums, the next step is to understand what factors shape these expectations. A simple test is to compare L1 price performance with BTC. If currency premium expectations primarily reflect BTC's price movements, then these assets should perform similarly to BTC's beta. On the other hand, if currency premium expectations are driven by factors specific to each L1 asset, then we expect them to have a much weaker correlation with BTC and exhibit more idiosyncratic behavior. As a proxy metric for L1, we examined the performance of the top ten L1 tokens by market capitalization (excluding HYPE) relative to Bitcoin (BTC) since December 1, 2022. These ten assets represent approximately 94% of the total L1 market capitalization and are therefore representative of the sector as a whole. During this period, eight of these ten assets underperformed Bitcoin in absolute terms, with six lagging behind Bitcoin by 40% or more. Only two assets outperformed Bitcoin: XRP and SOL. XRP's excess return was only 3%, and given that XRP's historical fund flows have primarily come from retail investors, we will not overemphasize this return. The only asset that significantly outperformed Bitcoin was SOL, with a return 87% higher than Bitcoin's. A deeper analysis of SOL's seemingly superior performance reveals that it may actually be underperforming. During the same period that SOL outperformed BTC by 87%, Solana's fundamentals exhibited parabolic growth. Total DeFi locked value increased by 2988%, transaction fees by 1983%, and DEX trading volume by 3301%. By any measure, Solana's ecosystem has grown 20 to 30 times since the end of 2022. However, as an asset designed to capture this growth, SOL has only outperformed BTC by 87%. Read it again. To achieve significant excess returns in the game against BTC, the L1 crypto ecosystem needs more than just 200-300% growth. It needs 2000-3000% growth to generate double-digit excess returns. In conclusion, we believe that although L1 valuations are still based on expectations of future currency premiums, market confidence in these expectations is quietly weakening. At the same time, the market has not lost confidence in BTC's currency premium, and BTC's lead over L1 is widening. While cryptocurrencies technically don't require transaction fees or revenue to support their valuations, these metrics are crucial for L1. Unlike Bitcoin, the core value of L1 lies in building an ecosystem (including applications, users, throughput, economic activity, etc.) that underpins its token. However, if L1's ecosystem usage declines year after year, partly due to reduced transaction fees and revenue, then L1 will lose its sole competitive advantage over Bitcoin. Without genuine economic growth, the market will find it increasingly difficult to believe in these L1 cryptocurrency narratives. Looking to the future Looking ahead, we expect this trend to continue into 2026 and beyond. With a few exceptions, we anticipate Bitcoin will continue to erode the market share of other L1 assets. Their valuations are primarily driven by expectations of future currency premiums, which will steadily decline as the market increasingly recognizes Bitcoin as the most competitive cryptocurrency. While Bitcoin will face challenges in the coming years, these issues are unclear and influenced by numerous unknowns, insufficient to substantially support the current currency premiums of other L1 assets. For L1 platforms, the burden of proof has shifted. Their narratives are no longer as convincing as Bitcoin's, and they cannot rely indefinitely on widespread market frenzy to support their valuations. The era when the idea that "we might one day become money" was enough to justify trillion-dollar valuations is over. Investors now have access to a decade's worth of data showing that L1's currency premium has only been sustainable during periods of rapid platform growth. Aside from these rare periods of explosive growth, L1 has consistently lagged behind Bitcoin, and when growth slows, the currency premium disappears.

Why is L1 token not outperforming BTC?

2025/12/05 19:00

Author: AJC; Source: Messari's upcoming "Crypto Themes for 2026"

Cryptocurrency drives industry development

Refocusing on cryptocurrencies is crucial because this is where most of the capital in the industry ultimately seeks to invest. The total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies is $3.26 trillion. Of this, Bitcoin (BTC) accounts for $1.80 trillion, or 55%. Of the remaining $1.45 trillion, approximately $0.83 trillion is concentrated in altcoins (L1), which together account for approximately $2.63 trillion (about 81% of all cryptocurrency capitalization), allocated to assets already regarded as currencies or perceived as potentially receiving a currency premium.

Therefore, whether you are a trader, investor, capital allocator, or portfolio builder, understanding how the market allocates and withdraws currency premiums is crucial. In the cryptocurrency space, nothing influences valuation more than whether the market is willing to treat an asset as currency. Thus, predicting where future currency premiums will accumulate is arguably one of the most important elements in portfolio construction within this industry.

So far, our focus has been primarily on Bitcoin, but other assets worth $0.83 trillion are also worth exploring; they may or may not be considered currencies. We expect Bitcoin to continue gaining market share from gold and other non-sovereign wealth stores in the coming years. But where does this leave L1? Does a rise in L1 mean all assets benefit, or will Bitcoin partially compensate for its gap with gold by extracting a monetary premium from L1?

First, it's helpful to understand the current valuation levels of Level 1 (L1). The top four L1 tokens—Ethereum ($361.15 billion), XRP ($130.11 billion), BNB ($120.64 billion), and SOL ($74.68 billion)—have a combined market capitalization of $686.58 billion, representing 83% of the L1 market. Beyond the top four, valuations drop rapidly (TRX's market capitalization is $26.67 billion), but interestingly, the long tail remains quite substantial. The total market capitalization of L1 tokens outside the top 15 is $18.06 billion, representing 2% of the total L1 market capitalization.

Importantly, L1 market capitalization does not fully reflect the implied currency premium. There are three main L1 valuation frameworks:

  1. Currency premium
  2. Real economic value (REV), and
  3. The need for economic security

Therefore, the market value of a project is not simply a result of the market treating it as currency.

Currency premium, rather than revenue, is the main driver of L1 valuation.

Despite these competing valuation frameworks, the market increasingly favors evaluating L1s from a revenue-driven perspective rather than a currency premium perspective. Over the past few years, the overall price-to-sales ratio (P/S) for all L1s with a market capitalization exceeding $1 billion has remained relatively stable, typically between 150 and 200x. However, this overall figure is misleading because it includes TRON and Hyperliquid. In the past 30 days, TRX and HYPE generated 70% of the group's revenue but only accounted for 4% of its market capitalization.

After removing these two outliers, the truth becomes clear: even as revenue declined, the L1 valuation continued to rise. The adjusted price-to-sales ratio also continued to increase.

  • November 30, 2021 - 40x
  • November 30, 2022 - 212x
  • November 30, 2023 - 137 times
  • November 30, 2024 - 205x
  • November 30, 2025 - 536x

An explanation based on actual economic value might suggest that the market is simply pricing in future revenue growth. However, this explanation doesn't hold up to scrutiny. In the same L1 token portfolio (still excluding TRON and Hyperliquid), revenue declined in all but one year:

  • 2021 – US$12.33 billion
  • 2022 – US$4.89 billion (down 60% year-on-year)
  • 2023 – $2.72 billion (down 44% year-on-year)
  • 2024 – US$3.55 billion (31% year-on-year growth)
  • 2025 – $1.7 billion annualized (down 52% year-over-year)

We believe the simplest and most direct explanation is that these valuations are driven by a currency premium, rather than by current or future income.

L1 tokens continue to underperform Bitcoin.

If L1 valuations are driven by expectations of currency premiums, the next step is to understand what factors shape these expectations. A simple test is to compare L1 price performance with BTC. If currency premium expectations primarily reflect BTC's price movements, then these assets should perform similarly to BTC's beta. On the other hand, if currency premium expectations are driven by factors specific to each L1 asset, then we expect them to have a much weaker correlation with BTC and exhibit more idiosyncratic behavior.

As a proxy metric for L1, we examined the performance of the top ten L1 tokens by market capitalization (excluding HYPE) relative to Bitcoin (BTC) since December 1, 2022. These ten assets represent approximately 94% of the total L1 market capitalization and are therefore representative of the sector as a whole. During this period, eight of these ten assets underperformed Bitcoin in absolute terms, with six lagging behind Bitcoin by 40% or more. Only two assets outperformed Bitcoin: XRP and SOL. XRP's excess return was only 3%, and given that XRP's historical fund flows have primarily come from retail investors, we will not overemphasize this return. The only asset that significantly outperformed Bitcoin was SOL, with a return 87% higher than Bitcoin's.

A deeper analysis of SOL's seemingly superior performance reveals that it may actually be underperforming. During the same period that SOL outperformed BTC by 87%, Solana's fundamentals exhibited parabolic growth. Total DeFi locked value increased by 2988%, transaction fees by 1983%, and DEX trading volume by 3301%. By any measure, Solana's ecosystem has grown 20 to 30 times since the end of 2022. However, as an asset designed to capture this growth, SOL has only outperformed BTC by 87%.

Read it again.

To achieve significant excess returns in the game against BTC, the L1 crypto ecosystem needs more than just 200-300% growth. It needs 2000-3000% growth to generate double-digit excess returns.

In conclusion, we believe that although L1 valuations are still based on expectations of future currency premiums, market confidence in these expectations is quietly weakening. At the same time, the market has not lost confidence in BTC's currency premium, and BTC's lead over L1 is widening.

While cryptocurrencies technically don't require transaction fees or revenue to support their valuations, these metrics are crucial for L1. Unlike Bitcoin, the core value of L1 lies in building an ecosystem (including applications, users, throughput, economic activity, etc.) that underpins its token. However, if L1's ecosystem usage declines year after year, partly due to reduced transaction fees and revenue, then L1 will lose its sole competitive advantage over Bitcoin. Without genuine economic growth, the market will find it increasingly difficult to believe in these L1 cryptocurrency narratives.

Looking to the future

Looking ahead, we expect this trend to continue into 2026 and beyond. With a few exceptions, we anticipate Bitcoin will continue to erode the market share of other L1 assets. Their valuations are primarily driven by expectations of future currency premiums, which will steadily decline as the market increasingly recognizes Bitcoin as the most competitive cryptocurrency. While Bitcoin will face challenges in the coming years, these issues are unclear and influenced by numerous unknowns, insufficient to substantially support the current currency premiums of other L1 assets.

For L1 platforms, the burden of proof has shifted. Their narratives are no longer as convincing as Bitcoin's, and they cannot rely indefinitely on widespread market frenzy to support their valuations. The era when the idea that "we might one day become money" was enough to justify trillion-dollar valuations is over. Investors now have access to a decade's worth of data showing that L1's currency premium has only been sustainable during periods of rapid platform growth. Aside from these rare periods of explosive growth, L1 has consistently lagged behind Bitcoin, and when growth slows, the currency premium disappears.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Potential Double Bottom Strengthens Amid Ripple’s 250M Transfer

XRP Potential Double Bottom Strengthens Amid Ripple’s 250M Transfer

The post XRP Potential Double Bottom Strengthens Amid Ripple’s 250M Transfer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple’s transfer of 250 million XRP to an unknown wallet has immediately altered the short-term liquidity for XRP price, reducing available tokens in sell zones and potentially supporting a bullish reversal. This move coincides with shrinking exchange reserves, signaling tighter supply amid growing buyer interest. Ripple transferred 250 million XRP, impacting circulating supply and exchange liquidity. XRP price shows a potential double-bottom pattern at $1.99, with a key neckline at $2.2443. Exchange reserves dropped 2.51%, while taker buy CVD rose, indicating stronger buyer aggression per CryptoQuant data. Ripple’s 250M XRP transfer tightens liquidity, boosting XRP price potential amid double-bottom signals. Explore how shrinking reserves and rising CVD support bullish trends—stay informed on crypto shifts today. What does Ripple’s 250 million XRP transfer mean for XRP price? Ripple’s transfer of 250 million XRP to an unknown wallet has reshaped the short-term liquidity environment for XRP price by reducing the number of tokens readily available in sell zones. This large movement, often seen as a strategic repositioning, highlights implications for circulating supply and forces traders to reassess market dynamics. As fewer XRP tokens sit in immediate exchange reserves, the transfer could amplify price reactions to buying pressure, especially with supporting on-chain indicators. How is the double-bottom pattern influencing XRP price action? XRP price has formed a potential double-bottom structure around the $1.99 level, where both touches demonstrated strong rejection from buyers, establishing this zone as a critical support. This pattern suggests a possible brief test near $1.90 before advancing, with the neckline at $2.2443 serving as the pivotal breakout point; surpassing it could target $2.5021. On-chain data from TradingView reinforces this setup, as volume profiles align with historical resistance breaks, and expert analysis from market observers notes that such formations often precede 10-15% rallies in similar conditions. Short sentences here emphasize: the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 10:28
CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

The post CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. An announcement was made by CME Group, the largest derivatives exchanger worldwide, revealed that it would introduce options for Solana and XRP futures. It is the latest addition to CME crypto derivatives as institutions and retail investors increase their demand for Solana and XRP. CME Expands Crypto Offerings With Solana and XRP Options Launch According to a press release, the launch is scheduled for October 13, 2025, pending regulatory approval. The new products will allow traders to access options on Solana, Micro Solana, XRP, and Micro XRP futures. Expiries will be offered on business days on a monthly, and quarterly basis to provide more flexibility to market players. CME Group said the contracts are designed to meet demand from institutions, hedge funds, and active retail traders. According to Giovanni Vicioso, the launch reflects high liquidity in Solana and XRP futures. Vicioso is the Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products for the CME Group. He noted that the new contracts will provide additional tools for risk management and exposure strategies. Recently, CME XRP futures registered record open interest amid ETF approval optimism, reinforcing confidence in contract demand. Cumberland, one of the leading liquidity providers, welcomed the development and said it highlights the shift beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. FalconX, another trading firm, added that rising digital asset treasuries are increasing the need for hedging tools on alternative tokens like Solana and XRP. High Record Trading Volumes Demand Solana and XRP Futures Solana futures and XRP continue to gain popularity since their launch earlier this year. According to CME official records, many have bought and sold more than 540,000 Solana futures contracts since March. A value that amounts to over $22 billion dollars. Solana contracts hit a record 9,000 contracts in August, worth $437 million. Open interest also set a record at 12,500 contracts.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:39
Peter Schiff Challenges Trump to U.S. Economy Debate After Bitcoin-Gold Clash with CZ

Peter Schiff Challenges Trump to U.S. Economy Debate After Bitcoin-Gold Clash with CZ

The post Peter Schiff Challenges Trump to U.S. Economy Debate After Bitcoin-Gold Clash with CZ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Peter Schiff has challenged President Trump to a public debate on the U.S. economy following Trump’s criticism of his comments on the ongoing affordability crisis. This exchange highlights tensions over inflation, economic policies, and their impacts on everyday Americans amid claims of falling prices and recovery. Schiff’s Challenge: Gold advocate Peter Schiff proposes a debate to discuss Trump’s economic strategies and their role in rising costs. Trump’s Response: The president labels Schiff a detractor and insists prices are dropping, attributing issues to prior administration policies. Broader Context: Searches for affordability have surged 110% year-over-year, reflecting public concerns despite official dismissals, per Google data. Peter Schiff challenges Trump to debate U.S. economy amid affordability crisis and inflation debates. Explore Schiff’s views on Bitcoin vs. gold and policy impacts—stay informed on crypto’s role in financial stability today. What is Peter Schiff’s Challenge to President Trump About? Peter Schiff’s challenge to President Trump stems from a heated exchange over the U.S. economy’s health, particularly the affordability crisis affecting Americans. On December 6, 2025, during an appearance on Fox & Friends Weekend, Schiff highlighted how inflation is accelerating under current policies, exacerbating everyday cost pressures. Trump responded sharply on Truth Social, calling Schiff a “Trump hating loser” and claiming prices are falling dramatically, including gasoline at $1.99 per gallon in some states. Schiff then invited Trump or a representative to debate these economic realities publicly, emphasizing the need for truthful discourse on policy effectiveness. How Does Peter Schiff’s Debate with CZ Relate to Economic Concerns? Peter Schiff’s recent debate with Changpeng Zhao (CZ), founder of Binance, at Binance Blockchain Week in Dubai underscores his longstanding skepticism toward cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, tying directly into broader economic discussions on inflation and asset value. Schiff argued that Bitcoin lacks inherent value, serving only as a speculative tool…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 10:01